• Daniele Boghi, Kyung Woo Kim, Jun Hyun Kim, Sang-Il Lee, Ji Yeon Kim, Kyung-Tae Kim, Andrea Ambrosoli, Giovanni Guarneri, Giovanni Landoni, and Luca Cabrini.
• Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Ospedale Filippo Del Ponte, Varese, Italy.
• Pediatr Crit Care Me. 2023 Feb 1; 24 (2): 123132123-132.

ObjectiveTo perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on the use of noninvasive ventilation (NIV) for acute respiratory failure (ARF) in pediatric patients.Data SourcesWe searched PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Central Register of Clinical Trials, and Clinicaltrials.gov with a last update on July 31, 2022.Study SelectionWe included RCTs comparing NIV with any comparator (standard oxygen therapy and high-flow nasal cannula [HFNC]) in pediatric patients with ARF. We excluded studies performed on neonates and on chronic respiratory failure patients.Data ExtractionBaseline characteristics, intubation rate, mortality, and hospital and ICU length of stays were extracted by trained investigators.Data SynthesisWe identified 15 RCTs (2,679 patients) for the final analyses. The intubation rate was 109 of 945 (11.5%) in the NIV group, and 158 of 1,086 (14.5%) in the control group (risk ratio, 0.791; 95% CI, 0.629-0.996; p = 0.046; I2 = 0%; number needed to treat = 31). Findings were strengthened after removing studies with intervention duration shorter than an hour and after excluding studies with cross-over as rescue treatment. There was no difference in mortality, and ICU and hospital length of stays.ConclusionsIn pediatric patients, NIV applied for ARF might reduce the intubation rate compared with standard oxygen therapy or HFNC. No difference in mortality was observed.Copyright © 2022 by the Society of Critical Care Medicine and the World Federation of Pediatric Intensive and Critical Care Societies.

21 keywords...

hide…