• Michael R Bronsert, William G Henderson, Kathryn L Colborn, Adam R Dyas, Helen J Madsen, Yaxu Zhuang, Anne Lambert-Kerzner, and Robert A Meguid.
• From the Surgical Outcomes and Applied Research Program (Bronsert, Henderson, Colborn, Dyas, Madsen, Zhuang, Lambert-Kerzner, Meguid), University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO.
• J. Am. Coll. Surg. 2023 Jan 1; 236 (1): 7157-15.

BackgroundPresent at the time of surgery (PATOS) is an important measure to collect in postoperative complication surveillance systems because it may affect a patient's risk of a subsequent complication and the estimation of postoperative complication rates attributed to the healthcare system. The American College of Surgeons (ACS) NSQIP started collecting PATOS data for 8 postoperative complications in 2011, but no one has used these data to quantify how this may affect unadjusted and risk-adjusted postoperative complication rates.Study DesignThis study was a retrospective observational study of the ACS NSQIP database from 2012 to 2018. PATOS data were analyzed for the 8 postoperative complications of superficial, deep, and organ space surgical site infection; pneumonia; urinary tract infection; ventilator dependence; sepsis; and septic shock. Unadjusted postoperative complication rates were compared ignoring PATOS vs taking PATOS into account. Observed to expected ratios over time were also compared by calculating expected values using multiple logistic regression analyses with complication as the dependent variable and the 28 nonlaboratory preoperative variables in the ACS NSQIP database as the independent variables.ResultsIn 5,777,108 patients, observed event rates for each outcome were reduced by between 6.1% (superficial surgical site infection) and 52.5% (sepsis) when PATOS was taken into account. The observed to expected ratios were similar each year for all outcomes, except for sepsis and septic shock in the early years.ConclusionsTaking PATOS into account is important for reporting unadjusted event rates. The effect varied by type of complication-lowest for superficial surgical site infection and highest for sepsis and septic shock. Taking PATOS into account was less important for risk-adjusted outcomes (observed to expected ratios), except for sepsis and septic shock.Copyright © 2022 by the American College of Surgeons. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.

17 keywords...

hide…