• Coralie Chambrin, Sander de Souza, Claire Gariel, Dominique Chassard, and Lionel Bouvet.
• From the Department of Anesthesia and Critical Care, Femme Mère Enfant Hospital, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France.
• Anesth. Analg. 2023 Jan 1; 136 (1): 101110101-110.

BackgroundInhaled halogenated anesthetics are responsible for half of operating room total greenhouse gas emissions. Sustainable anesthesia groups were set up in 4 Lyon, France, university hospitals (Hospices Civils de Lyon) in January 2018 and have supported a specific information campaign about the carbon footprint related to the use of inhaled halogenated anesthetics in June 2019. We aimed to assess whether implementing such information campaigns was associated with a decrease in the carbon footprint related to inhaled halogenated anesthetics.MethodsThis retrospective cohort study was conducted from January 1, 2015, to February 29, 2020, in 4 hospitals of the Hospices Civils de Lyon in France. Information meetings on sustainable anesthesia practices were organized by sustainable anesthesia groups that were set up in January 2018. In addition, a specific information campaign about the carbon footprint related to inhaled halogenated anesthetics was conducted in June 2019; it was followed by a questionnaire to be completed online. The monthly purchase of sevoflurane, desflurane, and propofol was recorded, and the estimated monthly carbon footprint from desflurane- and sevoflurane-related perioperative emissions was calculated. The interrupted time-series data from January 2015 to February 2020 were analyzed by segmented regression, considering both interventions (setting up of the sustainable anesthesia groups and specific information campaign) in the analysis and adjusting for 2 confounding factors (seasonality of the data and number of general anesthesia uses).ResultsAmong the 641 anesthesia providers from the study hospitals, 121 (19%) attended the information meetings about the carbon footprint of inhaled halogenated anesthetics, and 180 (28%) completed the questionnaire. The anesthetic activity from all 641 providers was considered in the analysis. After the sustainable anesthesia groups were set up, the carbon footprint of sevoflurane and desflurane started decreasing: the slope significantly changed ( P < .01) and became significantly negative, from -0.27 (95% confidence interval [CI], -1.08 to 0.54) tons.month -1 to -14.16 (95% CI, -16.67 to -11.65) tons.month -1 . After the specific information campaign, the carbon footprint kept decreasing, with a slope of -7.58 (95% CI, -13.74 to -1.41) tons.month -1 ( P = .02), which was not significantly different from the previous period ( P = .07).ConclusionsThe setup of the sustainable anesthesia groups was associated with a dramatic reduction in the carbon footprint related to halogenated anesthetics. These results should encourage health care institutions to undertake information campaigns toward anesthesia providers so that they also take into account the environmental impact in the choice of anesthetic drugs, in addition to the benefits for the patient and economic concerns.Copyright © 2022 International Anesthesia Research Society.

20 keywords...

hide…