• Paolo Solidoro, Filippo Patrucco, Carlo Albera, Valentina Pennazio, Francesco Guerrera, Massimo Boffini, Mauro Rinaldi, Marina Saad, Rossana Cavallo, Stefania Nicola, Luisa Brussino, and Cristina Costa.
• Department of Medical Sciences, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.
• Panminerva Med. 2022 Dec 1; 64 (4): 438441438-441.

BackgroundIn lung transplantation (LTx), Cytomegalovirus (CMV) management is based on prophylaxis or pre-emptive therapy. CMV hyperimmune globulins (CMV IG) added to prophylactic antiviral agents reduce CMV manifestations and acute rejection. The length of prophylaxis regimens is variable among studies with different results.MethodsWe conduced, after demonstrating efficacy of 12 months prophylaxis on acute rejections and CMV pneumonia, a single center retrospective study comparing, during the second year after LTx, clinical effects of a long (24 months) versus short (12 months) course of combined CMV prophylaxis scheme, based on antiviral agents and CMV IG.ResultsWe included 120 patients, 70 received a long (24 months) and 50 a short (12 months) prophylaxis. The long prophylaxis group, at 18th month, had a lower rate of neutrophilic alveolitis in BAL (63.6% vs. 94.4%, P=0.029). No other statistically significant differences were observed among the two groups of patients although we observed a reduction in both CMV (56.4% vs. 76.0% P=n.s.) and bacterial infections (23.7% vs. 32.0%, P=n.s.) during the 18th month of follow-up. We did not observe differences among two groups in acute rejection rate on transbronchial lung biopsies.ConclusionsThe combined long prophylaxis course based on antiviral agents and CMV IG provides a reduction trend in CMV or bacterial infections even if not statistically significant. The significant reduction in neutrophilia in BAL compared to the cohort undergoing prophylaxis for 12 months should be carefully interpreted. An 18-month prophylaxis could be a good suggestion to be tested by other larger prospective studies.

15 keywords...

hide…