• Allison Cohen, Timmy Li, Jeffrey Greco, Brendon Stankard, Peter Mingione, Victor Huang, Allen Gold, Nathan Zarider, Ari Nutovits, and Mathew Nelson.
• Department of Emergency Medicine, Donald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, Hempstead, NY, United States of America; Department of Emergency Medicine, North Shore University Hospital, Manhasset, NY, United States of America. Electronic address: acohen20@northwell.edu.
• Am J Emerg Med. 2022 Dec 1; 64: 129136129-136.

ObjectiveWe evaluated the sensitivity, specificity, predictive values, and likelihood ratios of hip effusion and/or iliopsoas hematoma on point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) performed by ultrasound fellows and fellowship trained emergency providers to identify hip fractures in emergency department (ED) patients with a high suspicion of hip fracture.MethodsThis was a prospective observational study of a convenience sample of patients with high suspicion of hip fracture at two academic EDs between 2018 and 2021. Patients with negative x-rays who did not receive further imaging with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) or computed tomography (CT) were excluded. Sonographers were blinded to clinical data and ED imaging results. At the primary site, 8 ultrasound fellows and 4 emergency ultrasound fellowship-trained emergency providers performed the ultrasonographic examinations. At the secondary site, 2 ultrasound fellows, 4 emergency ultrasound-fellowship trained physicians, and 1 sports medicine fellowship-trained emergency provider performed the ultrasonographic examinations. A positive ultrasound was defined as either the presence of a hip effusion or iliopsoas hematoma on the affected extremity. The primary outcome measures were sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), positive likelihood ratio (LR+), and negative likelihood ratio (LR-) of POCUS findings for identification of a hip fracture compared with a ranked composite reference standard consisting of x-ray, CT, or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI); the highest-level test performed for each patient was used for comparison.ResultsAmong 213 patients analyzed, all 213 received an x-ray, 116 received a CT scan, and 14 received an MRI; 113/213 x-rays (53.1%), 35/116 CT scans (30.2%), and 7/14 MRIs (50.0%) were positive for a hip fracture. A total of 123 patients were diagnosed with a hip fracture (57.7%). There were 13 false negative x-ray results. Overall, compared with the reference standard of x-ray, CT, or MRI, POCUS had a sensitivity of 97% (95% CI: 94%, 100%), specificity of 70% (95% CI: 61%, 79%), PPV of 82% (95% CI: 75%, 88%), and NPV of 94% (95% CI: 88%, 100%) in the identification of hip fractures; with a positive likelihood ratio of 3.22 (95% CI: 2.35, 4.43) and negative likelihood ratio of 0.05 (95% CI: 0.02, 0.12).ConclusionIn a convenience sample of ED patients with high clinical suspicion for hip fracture, the presence of a hip effusion and/or iliopsoas hematoma on POCUS performed by expert emergency ultrasonographers showed high sensitivity in diagnosing patients with a hip fracture.Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

3 keywords...

hide…