• Marina Oi, Takaaki Maruhashi, Yutaro Kurihara, and Yasushi Asari.
• Department of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Kitasato University School of Medicine, 1-15-1 Kitasato, Minami-Ku, Sagamihara, Kanagawa, 252-0375, Japan.
• J Clin Monit Comput. 2023 Jun 1; 37 (3): 867872867-872.

AbstractThe arterial pressure line (A-line) is primarily inserted through the radial artery. However, accidental removal due to joint movement can be problematic in the intensive care unit (ICU). This study aimed to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of A-line insertion in the ICU through the distal radial approach (DRA), which is used in cardiac catheterization. This single-center, prospective, comparative study included 200 patients (≥ 20 years) who were brought to our hospital for emergency care and required A-line insertion. Patients were quasi-randomized to the traditional radial approach (TRA) or DRA. Data were recorded at the time of A-line insertion, administration, and removal. We evaluated the vessel diameter, number of punctures, success of the procedure, presence of complications, such as infection during management, and time taken for hemostasis after catheter removal. The primary endpoint was the accidental removal rate. Due to incomplete information, data were collected for 193 patients (96 TRA and 97 DRA). Successful procedures were observed in 95 of the 96 patients with TRA and 94 of the 97 patients with DRA. Guidewire use during insertion was significantly more common in the DRA group (P < 0.01) and post-puncture splint fixation was significantly more common in the TRA group (P < 0.01). Accidental removal, the primary endpoint, was observed in 10 patients with TRAs and 11 patients with DRAs, with no significant difference between the two groups (P > 0.99). DRA is as safe and effective as the TRA, suggesting that it is useful as a new A-line insertion site.© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature B.V.

15 keywords...

hide…