• Li Zhou, Hongmei Li, Mingjuan Li, and Li Liu.
• Department of Anesthesiology, The Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University, No. 25 Taiping St, Jiangyang District, Luzhou, 646000, China.
• J Clin Monit Comput. 2023 Apr 1; 37 (2): 365377365-377.

AbstractThe optimization of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) according to respiratory mechanics [driving pressure or respiratory system compliance (Crs)] is a simple and straightforward strategy. However, its validity to prevent postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs) remains unclear. Here, we performed a meta-analysis to assess such efficacy. We searched PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared personalized PEEP based on respiratory mechanics and constant PEEP to prevent PPCs in adults. The primary outcome was PPCs. Fourteen studies with 1105 patients were included. Compared with those who received constant PEEP, patients who received optimized PEEP exhibited a significant reduction in the incidence of PPCs (RR = 0.54, 95% CI 0.42 to 0.69). The results of commonly happened PPCs (pulmonary infections, hypoxemia, and atelectasis but not pleural effusion) also supported individualized PEEP group. Moreover, the application of PEEP based on respiratory mechanics improved intraoperative respiratory mechanics (driving pressure and Crs) and oxygenation. The PEEP titration method based on respiratory mechanics seems to work positively for lung protection in surgical patients undergoing general anesthesia.© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature B.V.

19 keywords...

hide…