• In vivo · Jul 2008

    Comparative Study Clinical Trial

    Skin grafting: comparative evaluation of two dressing techniques in selected body areas.

    • Federico De Gado, Stefano Chiummariello, Cristiano Monarca, Luca Andrea Dessy, Maria Ida Rizzo, Carmine Alfano, and Nicolò Scuderi.
    • Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, La Sapienza University, Rome, Italy.
    • In Vivo. 2008 Jul 1;22(4):503-8.

    BackgroundSkin grafting is a frequent surgical procedure used to reconstruct a soft-tissue deficit. Tie-over bolster dressing is the traditional technique made to fix the graft to the recipient area. This dressing does not always provide satisfactory results in some difficult body areas, with poor skin graft taking as an outcome. Here, we used a soft "polyurethane sponge" as a compressive tool.Materials And MethodsA therapeutic protocol was used to select patients, splitting them into 2 groups: tie-over bolster dressing versus polyurethane sponge. Data analysis and calculation of sample size were performed using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences Windows version 13.0.ResultsOf the 106 patients treated by traditional compressive dressing, 11 had complications, thus achieving a success rate of 89.6%. Of the 106 patients treated by polyurethane sponge dressing, 3 had complications, providing a success rate of 97.1%.ConclusionCompared with the conventional tie-over dressing, the sponge dressing technique was demonstrated to be more successful in graft taking in selected areas.

      Pubmed     Free full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…