• Joachim Risse, Matthias Fischer, Karl Matteo Meggiolaro, Kaschoz Fariq-Spiegel, Dirk Pabst, Randi Manegold, Clemens Kill, and David Fistera.
• Center of Emergency Medicine, University Hospital Essen, Germany. Electronic address: joachim.risse@uk-essen.de.
• Resuscitation. 2023 Apr 1; 185: 109688109688.

AimVideolaryngoscopy (VL) is a promising tool to provide a safe airway during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) and to ensure early reoxygenation. Using data from the German Resuscitation Registry, we investigated the outcome of non-traumatic out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) patients treated with VL versus direct laryngoscopy (DL) for airway management.MethodsWe analysed retrospective data of 14,387 patients from 1 January 2018 until 31 December 2021 (VL group, n = 2201; DL group, n = 12186). Primary endpoint was discharge with cerebral performance categories one and two (CPC1/2). Secondary endpoints were the rate of return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC), hospital admission, hospital admission with ongoing cardiopulmonary resuscitation, 30-day survival/ hospital discharge and airway management complications. We used multivariate binary logistic regression analysis to identify the effects on outcome of known influencing variables and of VL vs DL.ResultsThe multivariate regression model revealed that VL was an independent predictor of CPC1/2 survival (OR = 1.34, 95% CI = 1.12-1.61, p = 0.002) and of hospital discharge/30-day survival (OR = 1.26, 95% CI = 1.08-1.47, p = 0,004).ConclusionVL for endotracheal intubation (ETI) at OHCA was associated with better neurological outcome in patients with ROSC. Therefore, the use of VL for OHCA offers a promising perspective. Further prospective studies are required.Copyright © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

15 keywords...

hide…