• Corrado P Marini, Erin McMurdo, John McNelis, Erin Lewis, Anthony Policastro, Gary Lombardo, Dmitry Karev, and Patrizio Petrone.
• Jacobi Medical Center, Bronx, NY, USA.
• Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2023 Jun 1; 49 (3): 132913351329-1335.

BackgroundPlacement of a tracheostomy for patients requiring prolonged mechanical ventilation (PMV) improves patients' comfort, decreases dead space ventilation, allows superior airway hygiene, and reduces the incidence of ventilator-associated pneumonia. Controversy still exists regarding the role of standard tracheostomy (ST) as opposed to the less frequently done Björk flap tracheostomy (BFT). This study compares the functional outcomes of these two techniques.Study DesignSeventy-nine patients receiving tracheostomy in a 12-month period: 38 BFT vs. 41 ST. Data included demographics, indications for PMV, ventilator days before tracheostomy, time to and a number of patients who passed the fiberoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing (FEES), time to and a number of patients decannulated.ResultsIndications in both groups were PMV from trauma (18/38 vs 15/41), pneumonia (13/38 vs 13/41), and ARDS (7/38 vs 11/4), respectively (p > 0.05). Patients in both groups did not differ with regard to age, sex, GCS, duration of PMV before tracheostomy, the time to and a number of patients who passed the 1st FEES. However, the number of days and the number of FEES required before the next successful FEES in the 20 BFT and 21 ST patients who failed the 1st was 9 (4) vs. 16 (5), and 2 (1) vs. 4 (1), respectively (p < 0.05). Additionally, the number of intraoperative complications in aggregate were 0/38 in the BFT as opposed to 6/41 in the ST group (p < 0.05).ConclusionWe conclude that BFT may be associated with an overall shorter time to restoration of normal swallowing when compared to ST.© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany.

14 keywords...

hide…