• Hippokratia · Jul 2021

    Neuroendocrine neoplasm of the cystic duct: report of two cases and literature review.

    • D Raptis, E Savvides, G Langas, G Chatzimavroudis, and B Papaziogas.
    • 2nd Department of Surgery, "G. Gennimatas" Hospital, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece.
    • Hippokratia. 2021 Jul 1; 25 (3): 141144141-144.

    BackgroundNeuroendocrine neoplasm (NEN) of the cystic duct (CD) is an extremely rare entity, with misty clinical manifestation and incidental, in most cases, diagnosis. Due to its rarity, several dilemmas arise concerning the optimal treatment of this type of malignancy.Case DescriptionWe report two cases of histologically confirmed NENs of the CD from our institution. Furthermore, we present a literature review focusing on the treatment type and likelihood of recurrence. The two patients underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy (CCE) due to cholelithiasis and were both diagnosed with well-differentiated Grade 1 (G1) NEN. The first patient did not undergo further treatment as the surgical margins were clear. Regarding the second patient, complementary resection of the CD remnant was performed since the histopathological diagnosis indicated positive surgical margins. Active postoperative surveillance was suggested, and both patients remain disease-free to date. In the literature, we identified 22 previous cases of NENs of CD. Since there are still no standard guidelines, various surgical plans were adopted, varying from simple CCE to hepatic lobectomy and Roux en Y hepaticojejunostomy. Postoperative surveillance is reported for up to four years. Regardless of the implicated treatment plan, no patient was diagnosed with recurrent malignancy and the mortality rate was very low (1/22).ConclusionWe propose that cholecystectomy with ligation of the CD proximal to its junction with the common hepatic duct is an adequate oncological treatment for G1 NENs of the CD. When preoperative or perioperative suspicion for malignancy is made, a frozen section of the CD should be sent for pathological examination to confirm radical resection (R0). Nevertheless, there is a need for further research that could validate our findings. HIPPOKRATIA 2021, 25 (3):141-144.Copyright 2021, Hippokratio General Hospital of Thessaloniki.

      Pubmed     Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.