• Michelle P Lin, Sophie Karwoska Kligler, Benjamin W Friedman, Howard Kim, Kristin Rising, Margaret Samuels-Kalow, and Stephanie A Eucker.
• Department of Emergency Medicine, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA. Electronic address: mplin@stanford.edu.
• Ann Emerg Med. 2023 Jul 1; 82 (1): 112111-21.

AbstractPatient-reported outcome measures are commonly used in clinical trials and have been incorporated into routine clinical care in select specialties but have not been widely implemented in emergency medicine research and clinical care. We describe measurement-related barriers to patient-reported outcome measure use in the emergency department; administrative and practical considerations; implications of developing novel emergency medicine-specific patient-reported outcome measures; and key considerations for the use of patient-reported outcome measures in emergency medicine research and clinical care. Despite the unique barriers of the ED environment, potential solutions include the use of ED-validated patient-reported outcome measures when available; adapting existing short-form, multidimensional patient-reported outcome measures previously validated in diverse populations, ideally using computer-adapted testing; and collecting responses during anticipated wait times. With this work, we aim to inform barriers and best practices to the use of patient-reported outcome measures in emergency medicine research and clinical care to support future, more widespread implementation of patient-reported outcome measures within emergency care. The successful adoption of patient-reported outcome measures for diverse ED patient populations within the unique constraints of the acute care environment may help researchers, clinicians, and policymakers improve the quality and patient-centeredness of acute care.Copyright © 2022 American College of Emergency Physicians. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

18 keywords...

hide…