• Johannes Wacker.
• Institute of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Hirslanden Clinic.
• Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2023 Apr 1; 36 (2): 208215208-215.

Purpose Of ReviewRoutine monitoring of care quality is fundamental considering the high reported rates of preventable perioperative morbidity and mortality. However, no set of valid and feasible quality indicators is available as the gold standard for comprehensive routine monitoring of the overall quality of perioperative care. The purpose of this review is to describe underlying difficulties, to summarize current trends and initiatives and to outline the perspectives in support of suitable perioperative quality indicators.Recent FindingsMost perioperative quality indicators used in the clinical setting are based on low or no evidence. Evidence-based perioperative quality indicators validated for research purposes are not always applicable in routine care. Developing a core set of perioperative quality indicators for clinical practice may benefit from matching feasible routine indicators with evidence-based indicators validated for research, from evaluating additional new indicators, and from including patients' views.SummaryA core set of valid and feasible quality indicators is essential for monitoring perioperative care quality. The development of such a set may benefit from matching evidence-based indicators with feasible standard indicators and from including patients' views.Copyright © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.

25 keywords...

hide…