• Jennifer F Sloane, Chris Donkin, Ben R Newell, Hardeep Singh, and MeyerAshley N DANDCenter for Innovations in Quality, Effectiveness and Safety, Michael E. DeBakey VA Medical Center and Department of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA..
• Center for Innovations in Quality, Effectiveness and Safety, Michael E. DeBakey VA Medical Center and Department of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA. jfsloane92@gmail.com.
• J Gen Intern Med. 2023 May 1; 38 (6): 152615311526-1531.

AbstractInterruptions are an inevitable occurrence in health care. Interruptions in diagnostic decision-making are no exception and can have negative consequences on both the decision-making process and well-being of the decision-maker. This may result in inaccurate or delayed diagnoses. To date, research specific to interruptions on diagnostic decision-making has been limited, but strategies to help manage the negative impacts of interruptions need to be developed and implemented. In this perspective, we first present a modified model of interruptions to visualize the interruption process and illustrate where potential interventions can be implemented. We then consider several empirically tested strategies from the fields of health care and cognitive psychology that can lay the groundwork for additional research to mitigate effects of interruptions during diagnostic decision-making. We highlight strategies to minimize the negative impacts of interruptions as well as strategies to prevent interruptions altogether. Additionally, we build upon these strategies to propose specific research priorities within the field of diagnostic safety. Identifying effective interventions to help clinicians better manage interruptions has the potential to minimize diagnostic errors and improve patient outcomes.© 2023. This is a U.S. Government work and not under copyright protection in the US; foreign copyright protection may apply.

18 keywords...

hide…