• Zane Schnurman, Carolina Gesteira Benjamin, Mary Miceli, and Chandranath Sen.
• Department of Neurosurgery, NYU Langone Health, New York, New York, USA.
• Neurosurgery. 2023 Apr 1; 92 (4): 876883876-883.

BackgroundSurgical management of skull base chordomas has changed significantly in the past 2 decades, most notably with use of the endoscopic endonasal approach (EEA), although high quality outcome data using these modern approaches remain scarce.ObjectiveTo evaluate outcomes in a large series of patients treated by a single surgeon, using primarily the EEA.MethodsBetween 2006 and 2020, 68 patients with skull base chordoma underwent resection using mostly the EEA. Complications, outcomes, and potential contributing factors were evaluated using Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and univariable and multivariable Cox proportional hazards models.ResultsOverall 5-year survival was 76.3% (95% CI 61.5%-86.0%), and 5-year progression-free survival was 55.9% (95% CI 40.0%-69.0%). In multivariable analysis, radical resection was associated with significant reduction in risk of death (hazard ratio [HR] 0.04, 95% CI 0.005-0.33, P = .003) and disease progression (HR 0.05, 95% CI 0.01-0.18, P < .001). Better preoperative function status reduced risk of death (HR 0.42 per 10-point increase in Karnofsky Performance Scale, 95% CI 0.28-0.63, P < .001) and progression (HR 0.60 per 10-point increase in Karnofsky Performance Scale, 95% CI 0.45-0.78, P < .001). Localization at the clivus reduced risk of death (HR 0.02, 95% CI 0.002-0.15, P < .001) and progression (HR 0.24, 95% CI 0.09-0.68, P = .007) compared with tumors at the craniovertebral junction.ConclusionIn multivariable analysis, overall survival and progression-free survival of chordoma resection was most positively affected by radical resection, better preoperative functional status, and tumor location at the clivus rather than craniovertebral junction.Copyright © Congress of Neurological Surgeons 2022. All rights reserved.

29 keywords...

hide…