-
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. · Jun 2023
Randomized Controlled TrialSimple Aspiration Versus Drainage for Complete Pneumothorax: A Randomized Non-Inferiority Trial.
- Tania Marx, Luc-Marie Joly, Anne-Laure Parmentier, Jean-Baptiste Pretalli, Marc Puyraveau, Jean-Claude Meurice, Jeannot Schmidt, Olivier Tiffet, Gilbert Ferretti, Dominique Lauque, Didier Honnart, Al FreijatFarajFService de pneumologie, Hôpital Nords Franche-Comté, Trévenans, France., Alain Eric Dubart, Romain Genre Grandpierre, Alain Viallon, Dominique Perdu, Pierre Marie Roy, Toufiq El Cadi, Nathalie Bronet, Grégory Duncan, Gilles Cardot, Philippe Lestavel, Frédéric Mauny, and Thibaut Desmettre.
- Service d'accueil des urgences.
- Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2023 Jun 1; 207 (11): 147514851475-1485.
AbstractRationale: Management of first episodes of primary spontaneous pneumothorax remains the subject of debate. Objectives: To determine whether first-line simple aspiration is noninferior to first-line chest tube drainage for lung expansion in patients with complete primary spontaneous pneumothorax. Methods: We conducted a prospective, open-label, randomized noninferiority trial. Adults aged 18-50 years with complete primary spontaneous pneumothorax (total separation of the lung from the chest wall), recruited at 31 French hospitals from 2009 to 2015, received simple aspiration (n = 200) or chest tube drainage (n = 202) as first-line treatment. The primary outcome was pulmonary expansion 24 hours after the procedure. Secondary outcomes were tolerance of treatment, occurrence of adverse events, and recurrence of pneumothorax within 1 year. Substantial discordance in the numerical inputs used for trial planning and the actual trial rates of the primary outcome resulted in a reevaluation of the trial analysis plan. Measurement and Main Results: Treatment failure occurred in 29% in the aspiration group and 18% in the chest tube drainage group (difference in failure rate, 0.113; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.026-0.200). The aspiration group experienced less pain overall (mean difference, -1.4; 95% CI, -1.89, -0.91), less pain limiting breathing (frequency difference, -0.18; 95% CI, -0.27, -0.09), and less kinking of the device (frequency difference, -0.05; 95% CI, -0.09, -0.01). Recurrence of pneumothorax was 20% in this group versus 27% in the drainage group (frequency difference, -0.07; 95% CI, -0.16, +0.02). Conclusions: First-line management of complete primary spontaneous pneumothorax with simple aspiration had a higher failure rate than chest tube drainage but was better tolerated with fewer adverse events. Clinical trial registered with www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT01008228).
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:
![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.