• Pawan Shakya, Manoj Kumar Yadav, and Sagar Poudel.
• Department of Surgery, District Hospital, Ramechhap Bazaar, Ramechhap, Nepal.
• JNMA J Nepal Med Assoc. 2022 Aug 1; 60 (252): 672675672-675.

IntroductionAlthough the precise aetiology of meconium-stained amniotic fluid is still unclear, risk factors include advanced gestational age at delivery, mode of delivery, the prolonged second stage of labour, and intrauterine infection. It has been associated with poor perinatal outcomes including low Apgar scores, increased incidence of neonatal intensive care admission, and a high rate of perinatal death. The objective of the study was to find out the prevalence of meconium-stained amniotic fluid in term deliveries in a tertiary care centre.MethodsA descriptive cross-sectional study was done among term deliveries in the Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, in a tertiary care centre from inpatient records starting from 1 November 2019 to 1 November 2020 after obtaining ethical approval from the Institutional Review Committee (Reference number: PMG1911281316). Convenience sampling was done. Point estimate and 95% Confidence Interval were calculated.ResultsOut of 1699 term deliveries, meconium-stained amniotic fluid was seen in 91 (5.35%) (4.28-6.42, 95% Confidence Interval). Among these 69 (75.82%) newborns were delivered through lower segment caesarean section and 61 (67%) newborns had Grade II meconium-stained amniotic fluid.ConclusionsThe prevalence of meconium-stained amniotic fluid was similar to the studies done in similar settings.Keywordsapgar score; caesarean section; gestational age; perinatal death; pregnancy.

15 keywords...

hide…