• Mathilde C van Rossum, Pedro M Alves da Silva, Ying Wang, Ewout A Kouwenhoven, and Hermie J Hermens.
• Biomedical Signals and Systems, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands. m.c.vanrossum@utwente.nl.
• J Clin Monit Comput. 2023 Oct 1; 37 (5): 138714001387-1400.

AbstractWireless vital signs sensors are increasingly used for remote patient monitoring, but data analysis is often challenged by missing data periods. This study explored the performance of various imputation techniques for continuous vital signs measurements. Wireless vital signs measurements (heart rate, respiratory rate, blood oxygen saturation, axillary temperature) from surgical ward patients were used for repeated random simulation of missing data periods (gaps) of 5-60 min in two-hour windows. Gaps were imputed using linear interpolation, spline interpolation, last observation- and mean carried forwards technique, and cluster-based prognosis. Imputation performance was evaluated using the mean absolute error (MAE) between original and imputed gap samples. Besides, effects on signal features (window's slope, mean) and early warning scores (EWS) were explored. Gaps were simulated in 1743 data windows, obtained from 52 patients. Although MAE ranges overlapped, median MAE was structurally lowest for linear interpolation (heart rate: 0.9-2.6 beats/min, respiratory rate: 0.8-1.8 breaths/min, temperature: 0.04-0.17 °C, oxygen saturation: 0.3-0.7% for 5-60 min gaps) but up to twice as high for other techniques. Three techniques resulted in larger ranges of signal feature bias compared to no imputation. Imputation led to EWS misclassification in 1-8% of all simulations. Imputation error ranges vary between imputation techniques and increase with gap length. Imputation may result in larger signal feature bias compared to performing no imputation, and can affect patient risk assessment as illustrated by the EWS. Accordingly, careful implementation and selection of imputation techniques is warranted.© 2023. The Author(s).

12 keywords...

hide…