• Ilias Iliopoulos, David S Cooper, James A Reagor, Wonshill Koh, Bryan H Goldstein, Philip R Khoury, MoralesDavid L SDLSDivision of Pediatric Cardiac Surgery, The Heart Institute, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH., and Sarosh Batlivala.
• Division of Pediatric Cardiology, The Heart Institute, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH.
• Pediatr Crit Care Me. 2023 Mar 1; 24 (3): 204212204-212.

ObjectivesNear-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) has been increasingly accepted as a noninvasive marker of regional tissue oxygenation despite concerns of imprecision and wide limits of agreement (LOA) with invasive oximetry. New generation absolute monitors may have improved accuracy compared with trend monitors. We sought to compare the concordance with invasive venous oximetry of a new generation absolute NIRS-oximeter (FORESIGHT ELITE; CASMED, Branford, CT) with a modern widely used trend monitor (INVOS 5100C; Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN).DesignProspective single-center study.SettingTertiary pediatric heart center.PatientsChildren undergoing elective cardiac catheterization under general anesthesia. Time-paired venous oximetry samples (jugular and renal) were compared with NIRS-derived oximetry by two monitors using regression and Bland-Altman analysis.InterventionsNone.Measurements And Main ResultsWe enrolled 36 children (19 female, 10 cyanotic) with median age 4.1 years (25-75%, 2.5-7.8 yr) and weight 16.7 kg (12.3-29.1 kg). The absolute difference between NIRS-derived and invasive jugular oximetry was less than 10% in 67% of occasions for both monitors. Correlation was fair (Spearman rs = 0.40; p = 0.001) for the FORESIGHT ELITE and poor ( rs = 0.06; p = 0.71) for the INVOS 5100C. Bias and LOA were +6.7% (+22%, -9%) versus +1.3% (LOA = +24%, -21%), respectively. The absolute difference between NIRS-derived and invasive renal oximetry was less than 10% in 80% of occasions with moderate correlation ( rs = 0.57; p < 0.001) for the FORESIGHT ELITE and in 61% of occasions with moderate correlation ( rs = 0.58; p < 0.001) for the INVOS 5100C; bias and LOA were +3.6% (+19%, -12%) and -1.4 % (+27%, -30%), respectively. NIRS correlation with renal venous oximetry was worse for cyanotic versus noncyanotic patients ( p = 0.02).ConclusionsConcordance and LOA of NIRS-derived oximetry with invasive venous oximetry in the cerebral and renal vascular beds was suboptimal for clinical decision-making. Cyanosis adversely affected NIRS performance in the renal site.Copyright © 2023 by the Society of Critical Care Medicine and the World Federation of Pediatric Intensive and Critical Care Societies.

22 keywords...

hide…