• H C Labuschagne, J Venturas, and H Moodley.
• Department of Radiology, Charlotte Maxeke Johannesburg Academic Hospital, and Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa. chrisjanlab@live.com.
• S. Afr. Med. J. 2023 Feb 1; 113 (2): 758375-83.

BackgroundChest radiographic scoring systems for COVID-19 pneumonia have been developed. However, little is published on the utilityof these scoring systems in low- and middle-income countries.ObjectivesTo perform risk stratification of COVID-19 pneumonia in Johannesburg, South Africa (SA), by comparing the Brixia score withclinical parameters, disease course and clinical outcomes. To assess inter-rater reliability and developing predictive models of the clinicaloutcome using the Brixia score and clinical parameters.MethodsRetrospective investigation was conducted of adult participants with established COVID-19 pneumonia admitted at a tertiaryinstitution from 1 May to 30 June 2020. Two radiologists, blinded to clinical data, assigned Brixia scores. Brixia scores were compared withclinical parameters, length of stay and clinical outcomes (discharge/death). Inter-rater agreement was determined. Multivariable logisticregression extracted variables predictive of in-hospital demise.ResultsThe cohort consisted of 263 patients, 51% male, with a median age of 47 years (interquartile range (IQR) = 20; 95% confidenceinterval (CI) 46.5 - 49.9). Hypertension (38.4%), diabetes (25.1%), obesity (19.4%) and HIV (15.6%) were the most common comorbidities.The median length of stay for 258 patients was 7.5 days (IQR = 7; 95% CI 8.2 - 9.7) and 6.5 days (IQR = 8; 95% CI 6.5 - 12.5) for intensivecare unit stay. Fifty (19%) patients died, with a median age of 55 years (IQR = 23; 95% CI 50.5 - 58.7) compared with survivors, of medianage 46 years (IQR = 20; 95% CI 45 - 48.6) (p=0.01). The presence of one or more comorbidities resulted in a higher death rate (23% v. 9.2%;p=0.01) than without comorbidities. The median Brixia score for the deceased was higher (14.5) than for the discharged patients (9.0)(p<0.001). Inter-rater agreement for Brixia scores was good (intraclass correlation coefficient 0.77; 95% CI 0.6 - 0.85; p<0.001). A modelcombining Brixia score, age, male gender and obesity (sensitivity 84%; specificity 63%) as well as a model with Brixia score and C-reactiveprotein (CRP) count (sensitivity 81%; specificity 63%) conferred the highest risk for in-hospital mortality.ConclusionWe have demonstrated the utility of the Brixia scoring system in a middle-income country setting and developed the first SArisk stratification models incorporating comorbidities and a serological marker. When used in conjunction with age, male gender, obesityand CRP, the Brixia scoring system is a promising and reliable risk stratification tool. This may help inform the clinical decision pathway inresource-limited settings like ours during future waves of COVID-19.

24 keywords...

hide…