• Spine · Jul 2023

    Meta Analysis

    Surgical Treatment of Scoliosis Lenke type 5, Anterior versus Posterior, which Approach is Better? A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

    • Weishi Liang, Bo Han, Duan Sun, Yong Hai, Peng Yin, Yuzeng Liu, and Jincai Yang.
    • Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Beijing Chaoyang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
    • Spine. 2023 Jul 15; 48 (14): E223E234E223-E234.

    Study DesignSystematic review and meta-analysis.ObjectiveThis study aimed to compare the radiographical and clinical outcomes between anterior spinal fusion (ASF) and posterior spinal fusion (PSF) in Lenke type 5 adolescence idiopathic scoliosis.Summary Of Background DataPSF has been the standard operation for adolescence idiopathic scoliosis. ASF can also achieve a good curve correction effect with fewer fusion segments and minor invasion of paraspinal structures.Materials And MethodsA systematic literature research was conducted in PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science. Use meta-analysis to compare the changes of thoracolumbar/lumbar and thoracic curves and other important outcomes between ASF and PSF.ResultsA total of 427 ASF and 392 PSF patients from 12 studies were included. There was no significant difference in the correction degree of thoracolumbar/lumbar and thoracic curve between ASF and PSF ( P >0.05), except for PSF had more compensatory correction degree of thoracic curve at postoperation ( P <0.05). Besides, the loss of correction in thoracic curve in PSF at the last follow-up was significantly less than that in ASF ( P <0.05). PSF presented larger change values of thoracic kyphosis and lumbar lordosis at the last follow-up ( P <0.05). PSF showed a better effect in correcting trunk shift distance at the postoperation ( P <0.05) but less trunk shift distance correction from postoperation to last follow-up ( P <0.05). There was no significant difference in the incidence of proximal junctional kyphosis and estimated blood loss between the two approaches ( P >0.05). Moreover, ASF showed fewer fusion segments, but longer operation and hospital stay time ( P <0.05).ConclusionASF is capable of achieving similar correction in coronal curve and balance as PSF with fewer fusion segments. Spine surgeons should select an appropriate approach tailored to individual patients needs while considering procedural risks and benefits.Level Of EvidenceLevel II.Copyright © 2022 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.

      Pubmed     Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.