• Vincent N Nguyen, Mustafa Motiwala, Kara Parikh, L Erin Miller, Michael Barats, Christopher M Nickele, Violiza Inoa, Lucas Elijovich, Nitin Goyal, Daniel A Hoit, Adam S Arthur, Jacques J Morcos, and Nickalus R Khan.
• University of Tennessee Health Sciences Center Department of Neurosurgery, Memphis, Tennessee, USA.
• World Neurosurg. 2023 May 1; 173: 199207.e8199-207.e8.

BackgroundAtherosclerotic steno-occlusive cerebrovascular disease includes extracranial carotid occlusive and intracranial atherosclerotic disease. Despite the negative findings in Carotid Occlusion Surgery Study (COSS), many large centers continue to report favorable results for revascularization surgery in select groups of patients. The aim of our study was to perform an updated systematic review to investigate the role of revascularization surgery for atherosclerotic steno-occlusive patients in the modern era.MethodsFive independent reviewers performed Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses-guided literature searches in October 2022 to identify articles reporting clinical outcomes in adult patients undergoing bypass for atherosclerotic steno-occlusive disease. Primary endpoints used were perioperative and long-term ischemic strokes, intracerebral hemorrhage, bypass patency, and favorable clinical outcomes. Study quality was evaluated with Newcastle-Ottawa, JADAD, and the Oxford Center for Evidence-Based Medicine scales.ResultsA total of 6709 articles were identified in the initial search. Of these articles, 50 met the inclusion criteria and were included in the systematic review. A notable increase in the proportion of articles published over the past 10 years was observed. There were 6046 total patients with 4447 bypasses performed over the period from 1978 to 2022. The average length of follow-up was 2.75 ± 2.71 years. The average Newcastle-Ottawa was 6.23 out of 9 stars. There was a significant difference in perioperative stroke (odds ratio [OR], 0.65 [0.48-0.87]; P = 0.004), long-term ischemia (OR, 0.32 [0.23-0.44]; P < 0.0001), overall ischemia (OR, 0.36 [0.28-0.44]; P < 0.0001), and favorable outcomes (OR, 3.63 [2.84-4.64]; P < 0.0001) when comparing pre-COSS to post-COSS time frames in favor of post-COSS.ConclusionsBased on a systematic review of 50 articles, the existing literature indicates that long-term stroke rates and favorable outcomes for surgical revascularization for steno-occlusive disease have improved over time and are lower than previously reported. Improved patient selection, perioperative care, and surgical techniques may contribute to improved outcomes.Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

34 keywords...

hide…