• Eleonora Casarini, Signe Amalie Wolthers, RinggrenKristian BundgaardKBDepartment of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, North Denmark Regional Hospital, Denmark., Stig Nikolaj Fasmer Blomberg, and ChristensenHelle CollatzHCCopenhagen Emergency Medical Services, Telegrafvej 5, 2750 Copenhagen, Denmark; Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark..
• Copenhagen Emergency Medical Services, Telegrafvej 5, 2750 Copenhagen, Denmark; Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
• Resuscitation. 2023 May 1; 186: 109725109725.

AimThis study aimed to design and implement a new variable, the automated external defibrillator (AED) variable, within the Danish Cardiac Arrest Registry. The introduction of the new variable aims to investigate and solve the challenges of reporting out-of-hospital cardiac arrests.MethodsThis validation study examined all patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest from 2016 to 2019. Their medical records were reviewed to establish a variable for AED. All patients with an AED applied were included, and comparative analyses were carried out. The primary outcome was 30-day survival, and the secondary outcome was the return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) at any time.ResultsA total of 1576 cases were included; of those, 747 cases had an AED applied and received a shock, and in 829 cases, an AED was applied without delivering a shock. Most defibrillated patients were witnessed by bystanders n = 541, (72%). They presented a higher number of ROSC (57%) and higher 30-day survival, (35,2%) compared to patients who were not defibrillated. Of this group, only 47% patients were witnessed; 18% survived more than 30 days, p < 0.001. When comparing AED present with no AED present, the AED group were significantly more likely to be witnessed by bystanders and to have cardiopulmonary resuscitation by bystanders. No significant differences were found regarding the initial rhythm between the two groups. 30-day survival rate was 20% in the AED group compared to 14% in the non-AED group, yielding an OR of 1.14 (95% CI 1.20-1.66).ConclusionThis study highlights the differences between OHCA patients receiving defibrillation and those not receiving defibrillation after AED placement. These differences emphasise the need for uniform reporting of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. This study showed improvement in the completeness of the registration of OHCA by implementing the AED variable. However, a future effort to improve registration completeness is needed.Copyright © 2023. Published by Elsevier B.V.

13 keywords...

hide…