• Brandon A Sherrod, Trevor Schwehr, Daniel Waldram, Andrew Adams, Sterling Averett, Jeewon Ha, Simon Kahle, Derek Mitchell, Seth Polevoi, Andrew T Dailey, Andrew S Merryweather, and Marcus D Mazur.
• Department of Neurosurgery, Clinical Neurosciences Center, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT.
• Spine. 2023 Aug 1; 48 (15): E247E254E247-E254.

Study DesignBiomechanical study.ObjectiveTo demonstrate that robotic cervical traction can apply closed cervical traction as effectively as manual weight-and-pulley traction in extension spring and cadaveric models.Summary Of Background DataClosed cervical traction is used to reduce subaxial cervical spine dislocation injuries and to distract the intervertebral space during cervical spine surgery. Weight-and-pulley cervical traction relies on cumbersome and imprecise technology without any safeguard to prevent over-traction or weights being pulled/released inadvertently.MethodsA prototype robotic traction device was designed and manufactured by the authors with real-time tensile force measurement, ±1-lbs (5 N) force application accuracy, locking/non-backdriveable linear actuators with actuator position sensing, 200-lbs (900 N) maximum force capability, up to 20° of flexion/extension manipulation, <25-lbs (111 N) device weight, and compatibility with Gardner-Wells tongs or Mayfield head clamp. The device was tested using an extension spring model and an intact fresh cadaver specimen to assess applied and desired force over time and radiographic changes in the cervical spine as traction force increased. The cadaver was tested in manual traction initially and then robotic traction in 10-lbs (50 N) increments up to 80-lbs (355 N) to compare methods.ResultsThe prototype device met or exceeded all requirements. In extension spring testing, the device reached the prescribed forces of both 25-lbs (111 N) and 80-lbs (355 N) accurately and maintained the desired weight. In cadaveric testing, radiographic outcomes were equivalent between the prototype and manual weight-and-pulley traction at 80-lbs (355 N; disk space measurements within ±10% for all levels), and the device reached the desired weight within±1-lbs (5 N) of accuracy at each weight interval.ConclusionThis preliminary work demonstrates that motorized robotic cervical traction can safely and effectively apply controlled traction forces.Copyright © 2023 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.

15 keywords...

hide…