• Han Nijsink, Elke Arts, Luc Verhamme, Jan Biert, Mike Bemelman, Lars Brouwers, and Bas van Wageningen.
• 3D lab, Department of Maxillofacial Surgery, Radboud University Medical Centre, Netherlands. Electronic address: han.nijsink@radboudumc.nl.
• Injury. 2023 Apr 1; 54 (4): 116911751169-1175.

BackgroundCurrently, assessment of acetabular fracture reduction is mainly performed by evaluating 2D slices of 3D CT scans. This subjective method can potentially be improved by using 3D models and objective analysis tools. In order to evaluate the potential value of digital 3D reconstructed models in the assessment of acetabular fracture reduction, 3D reconstructions of the fractured acetabulum were compared to the mirrored healthy contralateral side for both the pre-, and post-surgical setting.MethodsThirteen patients with one-sided acetabular fractures were included in the study. All patients received a pre-, and postoperative CT scan. The similarity between the healthy acetabulum and the contralateral fractured acetabulum was determined by two observers for both the pre-, and postoperative setting by completing the following four steps; (1) mirroring of the fractured acetabulum, (2) initial manual alignment of this mirrored 3D model to the contralateral version, (3) surface-based matching (iterative closest point registration) using the acetabular cartilage surface, and (4) calculating the surface distances between affected and healthy acetabular 3D models. Descriptive statistics showed the surface distance between pre-, and post-surgical reduction, as well as the interobserver variability.ResultsA total of 13 patients with an acetabular fracture were included; 11 males and 2 females with a mean ± SD age of 55.6 ± 14.7 years. Digital mirroring of the fractured acetabula to the healthy acetabula was successful for both preoperative and postoperative situations in all patients. The median distance between both fractured and mirrored healthy contralateral acetabula was significantly larger (p<0.01) for the preoperative group (2.21 mm (interquartile range (IQR): 1.30 mm)) compared to the postoperative group (0.93 mm (IQR: 0.59 mm)). The median distance deviation was not significantly different (p = 0.96) between observers.ConclusionsThe results of comparing 3D model of fractured acetabula with the contra-lateral healthy acetabula before, and after surgical repair indicate that this method can be a suitable tool to objectively assess acetabular fracture reduction. Further research is needed to confirm the usefulness to predict future arthrosis after surgical repair.Copyright © 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.

23 keywords...

hide…