• Paul Van Heukelom, J Priyanka Vakkalanka, Robert Pedersen, and Andrew S Nugent.
• Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine, 200 Hawkins Drive, Suite RCP1008, Iowa City, IA 52242, USA. Electronic address: paul-vanheukelom@uiowa.edu.
• Am J Emerg Med. 2023 May 1; 67: 374037-40.

ObjectiveConceptually, inpatient boarding is a result in the delay of admitting patients from the Emergency Department (ED) to inpatient units, but there is no consistent definition across academic EDs. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the definition of boarding across academic EDs, and to identify mitigation strategies used by EDs to alleviate crowd management.MethodsThis was a cross-sectional survey of boarding-related questions (i.e., boarding definitions and practices) that were embedded into the annual benchmarking survey conducted by the Academy of Academic Administrators of Emergency Medicine and the Association of Academic Chairs of Emergency Medicine. Results were descriptively assessed and tabulated.ResultsOf the 130 eligible institutions, 68 participated in the survey. Approximately 70% of institutions reported starting the boarding clock at the time of ED admission, while 19% reported that the clock started with the completion of inpatient orders. Approximately 35% of institutions considered patients boarded within 2 h, while 34% considered patients boarded >4 h after admission decision. In response to ED overcrowding brought on by inpatient boarding, 35% reported using hallway beds for patient care. Surge capacity measures reported included having a high census/surge capacity plan (81%), going on ambulance diversion (54%), and institutional use of a discharge lounge (49%).ConclusionsWe found that definitions for boarding varied widely. Inpatient boarding has serious consequences to patient care and well-being, suggesting the need for standardized definitions to describe inpatient boarding.Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

14 keywords...

hide…