• Gabrielle Bunney, Vandana Sundaram, Anna Graber-Naidich, Katharine Miller, Ian Brown, Allison B McCoy, Brian Freeze, David Berger, Adam Wright, and YiadomMaame Yaa A BMYABDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA, United States of America. Electronic address: myiadom@stanford.edu..
• Department of Emergency Medicine, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA, United States of America.
• Am J Emerg Med. 2023 May 1; 67: 707870-78.

BackgroundChest pain (CP) is the hallmark symptom for acute coronary syndrome (ACS) but is not reported in 20-30% of patients, especially women, elderly, non-white patients, presenting to the emergency department (ED) with an ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI).MethodsWe used a retrospective 5-year adult ED sample of 279,132 patients to explore using CP alone to predict ACS, then we incrementally added other ACS chief complaints, age, and sex in a series of multivariable logistic regression models. We evaluated each model's identification of ACS and STEMI.ResultsUsing CP alone would recommend ECGs for 8% of patients (sensitivity, 61%; specificity, 92%) but missed 28.4% of STEMIs. The model with all variables identified ECGs for 22% of patients (sensitivity, 82%; specificity, 78%) but missed 14.7% of STEMIs. The model with CP and other ACS chief complaints had the highest sensitivity (93%) and specificity (55%), identified 45.1% of patients for ECG, and only missed 4.4% of STEMIs.ConclusionCP alone had highest specificity but lacked sensitivity. Adding other ACS chief complaints increased sensitivity but identified 2.2-fold more patients for ECGs. Achieving an ECG in 10 min for patients with ACS to identify all STEMIs will be challenging without introducing more complex risk calculation into clinical care.Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

17 keywords...

hide…