• Karen J O'Connell, Alexis Sandler, Anuj Dutta, Ramzy Ahmed, Tara Neubrand, Sage Myers, Benjamin Kerrey, and Aaron Donoghue.
• Division of Emergency Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, The George Washington School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Washington, DC, United States.
• Resuscitation. 2023 Apr 1; 185: 109741109741.

ObjectiveTo determine the effect of hand position on chest compression (CC) quality during CPR in young children.MethodsProspective observational exploratory study. Patients < 8 years receiving CC for > 2 minutes were enrolled. Data was collected from video review and CC monitor device and analyzed in 'CC segments' (periods of CC by individual providers). Four techniques were compared: two thumbs (2 T), hands encircling the chest; two fingers (2F) on the sternum; one hand on sternum (1H); two hands on sternum (2H). Univariate analysis of CC rate and depth between hand positions was performed through nonparametric testing, stratified by age category.Results47 patients received 824 minutes of CC. Among 270 CC segments in infants < 1 yo, 2 T was used in 27%; 2F 3%; 1H 18%; 2H 26%. Among 189 CC segments in children aged 1 to 8 yo, 1H was used in 26%; 2H 74%. Across all segments, median CC rate was 117 cpm (IQR 110-125). Median depth was 2.92 cm (IQR 2.44 - 4.04) in infants < 1 yo, 3.56 cm (IQR 2.92 - 4.14) in children 1 to 8 yo. 1H achieved greater depth than 2 T in infants (p < 0.01), and 2H achieved greater depth than 1H in children > 1 (p < 0.001).ConclusionsIn infants, 1H resulted in greater CC depth than 2 T. In children 1 to 8 yo, 2H resulted in greater depth than 1H.. These data suggest that different hand position during CPR in young children from what is currently recommended may result in better CPR quality.Copyright © 2023 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

12 keywords...

hide…