• Gregory J Misky, Bradley Sharpe, A Charlotta Weaver, Ashwini Niranjan-Azadi, Ashwin Gupta, Stephanie Rennke, Steve Ludwin, Christi Piper, Mlis, Vivien K Sun, Daniel J Brotman, and Maria Frank.
• Division of Hospital Medicine, University of Colorado, P.O. Box 6510, 12605 E. 16th Ave., Aurora, CO, 80045, USA. gregory.misky@CUAnschutz.edu.
• J Gen Intern Med. 2023 Jun 1; 38 (8): 195519611955-1961.

AbstractThis scoping review sought to identify and describe the state of academic faculty development programs in hospital medicine and other specialties. We reviewed faculty development content, structure, metrics of success including facilitators, barriers, and sustainability to create a framework and inform hospital medicine leadership and faculty development initiatives. We completed a systematic search of peer-reviewed literature and searched Ovid MEDLINE ALL (1946 to June 17, 2021) and Embase (via Elsevier, 1947 to June 17, 2021). Twenty-two studies were included in the final review, with wide heterogeneity in program design, program description, outcomes, and study design. Program design included a combination of didactics, workshops, and community or networking events; half of the studies included mentorship or coaching for faculty. Thirteen studies included program description and institutional experience without reported outcomes while eight studies included quantitative analysis and mixed methods results. Barriers to program success included limited time and support for faculty attendance, conflicting clinical commitments, and lack of mentor availability. Facilitators included allotted funding and time for faculty participation, formal mentoring and coaching opportunities, and a structured curriculum with focused skill development supporting faculty priorities. We identified heterogeneous historical studies addressing faculty development across highly variable program design, intervention, faculty targeted, and outcomes assessed. Common themes emerged, including the need for program structure and support, aligning areas of skill development with faculty values, and longitudinal mentoring/coaching. Programs require dedicated program leadership, support for faculty time and participation, curricula focused on skills development, and mentoring and sponsorship.© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Society of General Internal Medicine.

24 keywords...

hide…