• Noah M Joseph, Margaret A Sinkler, Steven Magister, Abigail Bacharach, Aaron Pang, Kirsten Boes, Heather A Vallier, Adam G Hirschfeld, and George Ochenjele.
• Department of Orthopaedics, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, 11100 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, OH 44106, USA. Electronic address: Noahjo18@gmail.com.
• Injury. 2023 Feb 23.

IntroductionManagement of displaced intra-articular calcaneus fractures continues to challenge surgeons. Use of the extensile lateral surgical approach (ELA) had been standard practice however wound necrosis and infection have become deterrents. The sinus tarsi approach (STA) has gained popularity as a less invasive technique to optimize articular reduction while minimizing soft tissue injury. Our aim was to compare wound complications and infections following calcaneus fractures treated using ELA versus STA.MethodsRetrospective review of 139 displaced intra-articular calcaneus fractures (AO/OTA 82C; Sanders II-IV injuries) treated operatively at 2 level-I trauma centers using STA (n = 84) or ELA (n = 55) over a 3-year period with minimum 1-year follow up was performed. Demographic, injury, and treatment-related characteristics were collected. Primary outcomes of interest included wound complications, infection, reoperation, and American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society ankle and hindfoot scores. Univariate comparisons between groups were conducted using Chi-Square, Mann-Whitney, and independent sample t-tests at the p < 0.05 significance level, where appropriate. Multivariable regression analysis was performed to identify risk factors for poor outcomes.ResultsDemographic characteristics were homogenous between cohorts. Most sustained falls from height (77%). Sanders III fractures were most common (42%). Patients treated with STA went to surgery earlier (6.0 days STA vs 13.2 ELA, p < 0.001). No differences were seen in restoration of Bohler's angle, varus/valgus angle, or calcaneal height, yet the ELA significantly improved calcaneal width (-2 mm STA vs -13.3 mm ELA, p < 0.001). There were no significant differences in wound necrosis or deep infection based on surgical approach (12% STA vs 22% ELA, p = 0.15). Seven patients underwent subtalar arthrodesis for arthrosis (4% STA vs 7% ELA). No differences in AOFAS scores were seen. Risk factors for reoperation included Sanders type IV patterns (OR = 6.6, p = 0.001), increasing BMI (OR = 1.2, p = 0.021), and advanced age (OR = 1.1, p = 0.005), not surgical approach.ConclusionDespite prior concerns, use of ELA versus STA for fixation of displaced intra-articular calcaneus fractures was not associated with more complication risk, illustrating both are safe when indicated and executed appropriately.Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

5 keywords...

hide…