• J Indian Med Assoc · Mar 2011

    Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study

    Comparison of neonatal outcome in women with severe pre-eclampsia undergoing caesarean section under spinal or general anaesthesia.

    • Subhankar Dasgupta, Barunoday Chakraborty, Debdas Saha, and Debdutta Ghosh.
    • Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Bankura Sammilani Medical College, Bankura 722102.
    • J Indian Med Assoc. 2011 Mar 1;109(3):166-70.

    AbstractIdeal method of anaesthesia during caesarean section in women with severe pre-eclampsia is difficult to decide. The aim and objective of the study were to compare neonatal outcome in women with severe pre-eclampsia, undergoing caesarean section in intrapartum period, either under general or spinal anaesthesia. Women with severe pre-eclampsia, undergoing caesarean section in intrapartum period, were included in the study. Diastolic blood pressure was kept below 100mm Hg by giving parenteral labetalol pre-operatively. All women received prophylactic magnesium sulphate (5g IV and 10g IM). Maternal blood- gas parameters were measured. Scalp blood pH estimation was done in all cases. Women undergoing caesarean section were randomised into two groups and received either spinal or general anaesthesia. Umbilical arterial catheterisation was done for collecting blood for estimating neonatal blood- gas parameters. Complete data was available in 82 women. Both the groups were comparable in terms of general demographic data, except that percentage of women having an induced labour was significantly more in the general anaesthesia group. Induction of anaesthesia and delivery interval was prolonged for the spinal group. Mean dose of phenylephrine was significantly higher for the spinal anaesthesia group. Preoperative maternal blood-gas parameters and foetal scalp blood pH were comparable in between groups. Difference in neonatal umbilical artery base deficit in between groups was not statistically significant (p = 0.99). Correlation coefficient between maternal base deficit and foetal base deficit was 0.414 (p = 0.01) and 0.06 (p > 0.1) respectively for general and spinal anaesthesia. Subgroup analysis in the population with pre-operative scalp blood pH < 7.2, neonatal umbilical artery base deficit was significantly higher in general anaesthesia group. Five minutes APGAR score was comparable but resuscitation at birth was more common in the general anaesthesia group. Correlation coefficient between maternal base deficit and foetal base deficit in this subgroup was 0.42 (p = 0.05) and -0.57 (p < 0.05) respectively for general and spinal anaesthesia.

      Pubmed     Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…