• Svenja Ravioli, Jolanda Oberle, Michael Haidinger, and Gregor Lindner.
• Department of Emergency Medicine, King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
• Am. J. Med. 2023 Jun 1; 136 (6): 585591585-591.

BackgroundHigher productivity and team stability have been shown for gender-diverse teams. However, there is a relevant and well-known gender gap in clinical and academic cardiovascular medicine. So far, no data concerning gender distribution in presidents and executive boards of national cardiology societies exist.MethodsIn this cross-sectional analysis, gender equality in presidents and representatives of all national cardiology societies, which were members of, or affiliated with, the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) in 2022, was analyzed. In addition, representatives of the American Heart Association (AHA) were evaluated.ResultsA total of 106 national societies were screened, of which 104 were included in the final analysis. Overall, 90 of 106 (85%) presidents were men, while 14 (13%) were women. In the analysis of board members and executives, a total of 1128 individuals were included. Overall, 809 (72%) board members were men, 258 (23%) women, and 61 (5%) of unknown gender. Except for society presidents in Australia, women were relevantly outnumbered by men in all world regions.ConclusionWomen were underrepresented in leading positions of national cardiology societies in all world regions. As national societies are important regional stakeholders, improving gender equality in executive boards might create women role models, help foster careers, and narrow the global cardiology gender gap.Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

15 keywords...

hide…