-
J Pain Symptom Manage · Aug 2023
ReviewClinical Decision Support Systems for Palliative Care Management: A Scoping Review.
- SantosFabiana Cristina DosFCDDepartment of Family, Community, and Health Systems Science (F.C.D.S, U.A.S., G.M.K.), College of Nursing, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA. Electronic address: fabianadossantos@ufl.edu., Urszula A Snigurska, Gail M Keenan, Robert J Lucero, and François Modave.
- Department of Family, Community, and Health Systems Science (F.C.D.S, U.A.S., G.M.K.), College of Nursing, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA. Electronic address: fabianadossantos@ufl.edu.
- J Pain Symptom Manage. 2023 Aug 1; 66 (2): e205e218e205-e218.
ContextWith the expansion of palliative care services in clinical settings, clinical decision support systems (CDSSs) have become increasingly crucial for assisting bedside nurses and other clinicians in improving the quality of care to patients with life-limiting health conditions.ObjectivesTo characterize palliative care CDSSs and explore end-users' actions taken, adherence recommendations, and clinical decision time.MethodsThe CINAHL, Embase, and PubMed databases were searched from inception to September 2022. The review was developed following the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses extension for scoping reviews guidelines. Qualified studies were described in tables and assessed the level of evidence.ResultsA total of 284 abstracts were screened, and 12 studies comprised the final sample. The CDSSs selected focused on identifying patients who could benefit from palliative care based on their health status, making referrals to palliative care services, and managing medications and symptom control. Despite the variability of palliative CDSSs, all studies reported that CDSSs assisted clinicians in becoming more informed about palliative care options leading to better decisions and improved patient outcomes. Seven studies explored the impact of CDSSs on end-user adherence. Three studies revealed high adherence to recommendations while four had low adherence. Lack of feature customization and trust in guideline-based in the initial stages of feasibility and usability testing were evident, limiting the usefulness for nurses and other clinicians.ConclusionThis study demonstrated that implementing palliative care CDSSs can assist nurses and other clinicians in improving the quality of care for palliative patients. The studies' different methodological approaches and variations in palliative CDSSs made it challenging to compare and validate the applicability under which CDSSs are effective. Further research utilizing rigorous methods to evaluate the impact of clinical decision support features and guideline-based actions on clinicians' adherence and efficiency is recommended.Copyright © 2023 American Academy of Hospice and Palliative Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:
![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.