• Pain Med · Aug 2023

    Technology and Tool Development for BACPAC: Qualitative and Quantitative Analysis of Accelerated Lumbar Spine MRI with Deep-Learning Based MR Image Reconstruction at 3T.

    • Misung Han, Emma Bahroos, Madeline E Hess, Cynthia T Chin, Kenneth T Gao, David D Shin, Javier E Villanueva-Meyer, Thomas M Link, Valentina Pedoia, and Sharmila Majumdar.
    • Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States.
    • Pain Med. 2023 Aug 4; 24 (Suppl 1): S149S159S149-S159.

    ObjectivesTo evaluate whether combining fast acquisitions with deep-learning reconstruction can provide diagnostically useful images and quantitative assessment comparable to standard-of-care acquisitions for lumbar spine magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).MethodsEighteen patients were imaged with both standard protocol and fast protocol using reduced signal averages, each protocol including sagittal fat-suppressed T2-weighted, sagittal T1-weighted, and axial T2-weighted 2D fast spin-echo sequences. Fast-acquisition data was additionally reconstructed using vendor-supplied deep-learning reconstruction with three different noise reduction factors. For qualitative analysis, standard images as well as fast images with and without deep-learning reconstruction were graded by three radiologists on five different categories. For quantitative analysis, convolutional neural networks were applied to sagittal T1-weighted images to segment intervertebral discs and vertebral bodies, and disc heights and vertebral body volumes were derived.ResultsBased on noninferiority testing on qualitative scores, fast images without deep-learning reconstruction were inferior to standard images for most categories. However, deep-learning reconstruction improved the average scores, and noninferiority was observed over 24 out of 45 comparisons (all with sagittal T2-weighted images while 4/5 comparisons with sagittal T1-weighted and axial T2-weighted images). Interobserver variability increased with 50 and 75% noise reduction factors. Deep-learning reconstructed fast images with 50% and 75% noise reduction factors had comparable disc heights and vertebral body volumes to standard images (r2≥ 0.86 for disc heights and r2≥ 0.98 for vertebral body volumes).ConclusionsThis study demonstrated that deep-learning-reconstructed fast-acquisition images have the potential to provide noninferior image quality and comparable quantitative assessment to standard clinical images.© The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Academy of Pain Medicine.

      Pubmed     Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.