-
Case Reports
Patient and Fetal Radiation-Induced Malignancy Risk From Imaging For Evaluation of Pulmonary Embolism in Pregnancy.
- John Austin McCandlish, Chinara Feizullayeva, Paul P Cronin, William O'Connell, Matthew A Barish, Pina C Sanelli, and Stuart L Cohen.
- Imaging Clinical Effectiveness and Outcomes Research (ICEOR), Department of Radiology, Northwell Health, Manhasset, New York; Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia.
- J Emerg Med. 2023 Mar 1; 64 (3): 295303295-303.
BackgroundImaging for diagnosis of suspected pulmonary embolism in pregnancy presents radiation concerns for patient and fetus.ObjectivesEstimate the risks of radiation-induced breast cancer and childhood leukemia from common imaging techniques for the evaluation of suspected pulmonary embolism in pregnancy.MethodsBreast and uterine absorbed doses for various imaging techniques were input into the National Cancer Institute Radiation Risk Assessment Tool to calculate risk of breast cancer for the patient and childhood leukemia for the fetus. Absorbed doses were obtained by synthesizing data from a recent systematic review and the International Commission on Radiological Protection. Primary outcomes were the estimated excess incidences of breast cancer and childhood leukemia per 100,000 exposures.ResultsBaseline incidences of breast cancer for a 30-year-old woman and childhood leukemia for a male fetus were 13,341 and 939, respectively. Excess incidences of breast cancer were 0.003 and 0.275 for a single and two-view chest radiograph, respectively, 9.53 and 20.6 for low- and full-dose computed tomography pulmonary angiography (CTPA), respectively, 0.616 and 2.54 for low- and full-dose perfusion scan, respectively, and 0.732 and 2.66 for low- and full-dose ventilation perfusion scan, respectively. Excess incidences of childhood leukemia were 0.004 and 0.007 for a single and two-view chest radiograph, respectively, 0.069 and 0.490 for low- and full-dose CTPA, respectively, 0.359 and 1.47 for low- and full-dose perfusion scan, respectively, and 0.856 and 1.97 for low- and full-dose ventilation perfusion scan, respectively.ConclusionExcess cancer risks for all techniques were small relative to baseline cancer risks, with CTPA techniques carrying slightly higher risk of breast cancer for the patient and ventilation perfusion techniques a higher risk of childhood leukemia.Copyright © 2022. Published by Elsevier Inc.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:
![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.