-
Scand J Prim Health Care · Jun 2023
Development over time in point-of-care test use in Danish daytime and out-of-hours general practice: a register-based study.
- Niels Kjær, Plejdrup HansenMaleneM0000-0002-8444-1369Center for General Practice at, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark., Schou PedersenHenrikH0000-0003-4826-6441Research Unit for General Practice, Aarhus, Denmark., Bondo ChristensenMortenM0000-0002-8342-7418Research Unit for General Practice, Aarhus, Denmark.Institute for Public Health, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark., and Linda Huibers.
- Research Unit for General Practice, Aarhus, Denmark.
- Scand J Prim Health Care. 2023 Jun 1; 41 (2): 108115108-115.
ObjectiveTo describe the development over time of the use of C-reactive protein (CRP) and rapid streptococcal detection test (RADT) point-of-care tests (POCT) in Danish general practice and to explore associations between patient characteristics and POCT use (i.e. CRP and RADT).Design And SettingsA register-based study including all general practice clinic consultations in daytime and out-of-hours (OOH) settings in Denmark between 2003 and 2018.SubjectsAll citizens who had at least one clinic consultation in daytime or OOH general practice within the study period.Main Outcome MeasuresWe estimated the total and relative use of CRP and RADT POCTs and described the development over time. Crude and adjusted proportion ratios (PRs) were calculated to explore associations between patient characteristics and POCT use.ResultsOverall, the relative use of CRP POCTs increased. At OOH, a steep increase was noticed around 2012. The relative use of RADT decreased. Patient age 40-59 years and existing comorbidity were significantly associated with a higher use of CRP testing in both settings. A significantly lower use of CRP testing was found for patients with higher educational level. We found a significantly higher use of RADT testing for patients aged 0-19 years and with higher household educational level, whereas comorbidity was associated with a lower use of RADT testing.ConclusionThe use of CRP POCT increased over time, whereas the use of RADT POCT decreased. Perhaps the success of implementing CRP as a tool for reducing antibiotic use has reached it limit. Future studies should focus on how and when POCT are used most optimal.Key pointsCRP POC tests and RADT POCTs are frequently used diagnostic tools in general practice, both in daytime and in the out-of-hours setting.There was an increased use of CRP POCTs, particularly in out-of-hours general practice, whereas the use of RADT POCTs declined between 2003 and 2018.CRP POCTs were associated with age of 40-59 years and co-morbidity, while the use of RADT was mostly associated with younger age.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:
![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.