• Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi · Nov 2011

    [Compliance on hand-hygiene among healthcare providers working at secondary and tertiary general hospitals in Chengdu].

    • Ke Han, Feng-man Dou, Li-jie Zhang, and Bao-ping Zhu.
    • Immunization Institution, Guangdong Provincial Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Guangzhou, China.
    • Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi. 2011 Nov 1;32(11):1139-42.

    ObjectiveTo evaluate the compliance on hand-hygiene and related factors among healthcare providers working at secondary and tertiary hospitals in Chengdu.MethodsOn-site observations regarding hand-hygiene compliance and facilities were conducted in 6 hospitals in Chengdu. Doctors and nurses were asked and recorded about their knowledge regarding hand-hygiene.ResultsOf 1535 activities where hand-hygiene was deemed necessary, under observating healthcare providers would perform hand-hygiene procedures 17.8% of the time (12.8% of the time before touching a patient, 21.0% of the time before touching objects around a patient, 27.3% of the time after touching a patient, and 31.5% of the time after removing gloves). Only 2.2% of the treating rooms were equipped with foot-operated or automatic faucets;of these only 24.5% had soap or alcohol-based hand-sanitizer, and 6.3% had paper towel or other hand-drying equipment. 92.8% of the healthcare providers knew of the six-step method on hand-washing. More than 90.0% of the healthcare providers knew that both palm and back of the hands as well as the front and back of the fingers should be washed. However, only 22.8% knew that the hand-washing procedure should last ≥ 15 seconds. Rates on hand hygiene among chief or more senior physicians (14.6%), attending physicians (9.2%) and junior doctors (15.6%), nurses in chief (25.0%), senior nurses (26.3%) and junior nurses (20.5%) showed no significant differences (P > 0.05). Similarly, scores on related knowledge between chief or senior physicians (12.4 ± 3.2), attending physicians (13.6 ± 3.3) and junior doctors (13.4 ± 2.9), nurses in charge (15.2 ± 2.0), senior nurses (14.8 ± 2.1) and junior nurses (14.3 ± 2.6) also showed no significant differences (P > 0.05). Rate on hand hygiene among nurses (22.7%) was significantly higher than that of the doctors (13.6%). Rate of hand hygiene among 50 - 59 years old healthcare providers (7.4%) was significantly lower than those of all the other age groups (17.1% - 25.0%); rate of female health care providers (19.5%) was significantly higher than that of males (13.8%). Similarly, the nurse's knowledge score (14.7 ± 2.3) was significantly higher than that of the doctors (13.2 ± 3.1). Among 50 - 59 years old healthcare providers, the rate was (12.2 ± 3.8) significantly lower than that of 20 - 29 (14.0 ± 2.6), 30 - 39 (14.3 ± 2.9) and 40 - 49 year olds (13.8 ± 2.7). Again, the knowledge score of females (14.5 ± 2.5) was significantly higher than that of males (12.7 ± 3.2) (P < 0.05).ConclusionThe high-level knowledge on hand-hygiene among healthcare providers in this area did not translate into good practices. Also, most of the hospitals had poor hand-hygiene equipment. We recommend that training and periodic monitoring be conducted, and hand-hygiene equipment be improved to facilitate hand-hygiene practices among healthcare providers.

      Pubmed     Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…