• World Neurosurg · Jul 2023

    Interrater Reliability of Cervical Neural Foraminal Stenosis using Traditional and Splayed Reconstructions: Analysis of 100 Scans.

    • Andrew M Hersh, Anika Zahoor, Danielle Livingston, Anthony Galinato, Hannah Recht, Jason Hostetter, Craig K Jones, Daniel Lubelski, and Haris I Sair.
    • Department of Neurosurgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
    • World Neurosurg. 2023 Jul 1; 175: e314e319e314-e319.

    ObjectiveThe oblique sagittal orientation of the cervical neural foramina hinders the evaluation of cervical neural foraminal stenosis (CNFS) on traditional axial and sagittal slices. Traditional image reconstruction techniques to generate oblique slices provide only a view of the foramina unilaterally. We present a simple technique for generating splayed slices that show the bilateral neuroforamina simultaneously and assess its reliability compared with traditional axial windows.MethodsCervical computed tomography (CT) scans from 100 patients were retrospectively collected and de-identified. The axial slices were reformatted into a curved reformat with the plane of the reformat extending across the bilateral neuroforamina. The foramina along the C2-T1 vertebral levels were assessed by 4 neuroradiologists using the axial and splayed slices. The intrarater agreement across the axial and splayed slices for a given foramen and the interrater agreement for the axial and splayed slices individually were calculated using the Cohen κ statistic.ResultsInterrater agreement was overall higher for the splayed slices (κ = 0.25) compared with the axial slices (κ = 0.20). The splayed slices were more likely to have fair agreement across raters compared with the axial slices. Intrarater agreement between the axial and splayed slices was poorer for residents compared with fellows.ConclusionsSplayed reconstructions showing the bilateral neuroforamina en face can be readily generated from axial CT imaging. These splayed reconstructions can improve the consistency of CNFS evaluation compared with traditional CT slices and should be considered in the workup of CNFS, particularly for less experienced readers.Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

      Pubmed     Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.