• Br J Anaesth · Jul 2023

    The Japanese Epidemiologic Study for Perioperative Anaphylaxis, a prospective nationwide study: clinical signs, severity, and therapeutic agents.

    • Yuki Sugiyama, Tomonori Takazawa, Natsuko Watanabe, Kiyoko Bito, Tetsuhiro Fujiyoshi, Shinsuke Hamaguchi, Takashi Haraguchi, Tatsuo Horiuchi, Yoshinori Kamiya, Noboru Maruyama, Hitoshi Masumo, Harumasa Nakazawa, Kazuhiro Nagumo, Masaki Orihara, Jun Sato, Kenichi Sekimoto, Kenichiro Takahashi, Mutsumi Uchiyama, Kazunobu Takahashi, Masao Yamaguchi, and Mikito Kawamata.
    • Department of Anesthesiology and Resuscitology, Shinshu University School of Medicine, Matsumoto, Japan.
    • Br J Anaesth. 2023 Jul 1; 131 (1): 170177170-177.

    BackgroundDiagnosis of perioperative anaphylaxis is difficult because of its non-specific and variable signs and symptoms. Therapeutic agents used to treat anaphylaxis and anaesthesiologist responses also vary depending on the case, which might affect outcomes; however, only a few studies have focused on these factors.MethodsThis prospective study of perioperative anaphylaxis, a part of the Japanese Epidemiologic Study for Perioperative Anaphylaxis, investigated the clinical signs, its severity, therapeutic drugs, epinephrine administration, and anaesthesiologist responses in cases of perioperative anaphylaxis to assess trends and variability. Shock index was used to assess severity of cardiovascular collapse.ResultsIn 43 patients analysed in this study, cardiovascular signs (88.4%) were the most frequent, followed by skin (81.4%) and respiratory signs (60.5%). The presence of signs increased during the clinical course. The median time from the first signs to diagnosis of anaphylaxis was 10 (5.0-17.8) min. The rates of epinephrine use were 30.2% (unused), 48.8% (i.v.), and 20.9% (i.m.). The median time from diagnosis of anaphylaxis to epinephrine administration was 7 (inter-quartile range: 1.5-8.0) min. Antihistamines and corticosteroids were each used in 69.8% of cases. The worst shock index was higher in patients who received i.v. epinephrine (2.77 [0.90] mean [standard deviation]) than in both no epinephrine use cases (1.35 [0.41]) and i.m. epinephrine cases (1.89 [0.77] (P<0.001]).ConclusionsThe clinical signs and treatments of perioperative anaphylaxis are variable, and the choice regarding epinephrine administration is based on symptom severity.Clinical Trial RegistrationUMIN000035350.Copyright © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.

      Pubmed     Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.