• Natasha Hudek, Jamie C Brehaut, Brian H Rowe, Phuong Anh Nguyen, Bahareh Ghaedi, Aline Christelle Ishimwe, Christopher Fabian, Justin W Yan, SivilottiMarco L AMLADepartments of Emergency Medicine and Biomedical, and Molecular Sciences, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada., Robert Ohle, Natalie Le Sage, Eric Mercier, Patrick M Archambault, Miville Plourde, Philip Davis, Andrew D McRae, Mona Hegdekar, and Venkatesh Thiruganasambandamoorthy.
• Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
• CJEM. 2023 May 1; 25 (5): 434444434-444.

BackgroundWide variations in emergency department (ED) syncope management exist. The Canadian Syncope Risk Score (CSRS) was developed to predict the probability of 30-day serious outcomes after ED disposition. Study objectives were to evaluate the acceptability of proposed CSRS practice recommendations among providers and patients, and identify barriers and facilitators for CSRS use to guide disposition decisions.MethodsWe conducted semi-structured interviews with 41 physicians involved in ED syncope and 35 ED patients with syncope. We used purposive sampling to ensure a variety of physician specialties and CSRS patient risk levels. Thematic analysis was completed by two independent coders with consensus meetings to resolve conflicts. Analysis proceeded in parallel with interviews until data saturation.ResultsThe majority (97.6%; 40/41) of physicians agreed with discharge of low risk (CSRS ≤ 0) but opined that 'no follow up' changed to 'follow-up as needed'. Physicians indicated current practices do not align with the medium-risk recommendation to discharge patients with 15-day monitoring (CSRS = 1-3; due to lack of access to monitors and timely follow-up) and the high-risk recommendation (CSRS ≥ 4) to potentially discharge patients with 15-day monitoring. Physicians recommended brief hospitalization of high-risk patients due to patient safety concerns. Facilitators included the CSRS-based patient education and scores supporting their clinical gestalt. Patients reported receiving varying levels of information regarding syncope and post-ED care, were satisfied with care received and preferred less resource intensive options.ConclusionOur recommendations based on the study results were: discharge of low-risk patients with physician follow-up as needed; discharge of medium-risk patients with 15-day cardiac monitoring and brief hospitalization of high-risk patients with 15-day cardiac monitoring if discharged. Patients preferred less resource intensive options, in line with CSRS recommended care. Implementation should leverage identified facilitators (e.g., patient education) and address the barriers (e.g., monitor access) to improve ED syncope care.© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Canadian Association of Emergency Physicians (CAEP)/ Association Canadienne de Médecine d'Urgence (ACMU).

16 keywords...

hide…