• Biswadev Mitra, Mark Fitzgerald, Peter Cameron, and Heather Cleland.
• The Alfred Emergency and Trauma Centre, Prahran, Victoria 3181, Australia. tamponade@bigpond.com
• ANZ J Surg. 2006 Jan 1;76(1-2):35-8.

BackgroundThe Parkland formula is established as the "gold standard" for initial fluid resuscitation for major burns. The purpose of this study was to review our fluid resuscitation practice for major burns to determine whether anecdotal observations of significant variations from the Parkland formula were wide spread and whether any difference could be used as a basis for a revision of fluid resuscitation in major burns.MethodsA retrospective review of 127 presentations to The Alfred Burns Unit with total body surface area (TBSA) affected > or =15% was conducted. A retrospective review of the resuscitation data from these patients was compared with the Parkland formula as well as other studies.ResultsA total of 49 patients with complete data on fluid administration and uncomplicated burns were included in the analysis. Significantly larger volumes of fluid (5.58 mL/kg per %TBSA) were given to these patients in the first 24 h than predicted by the Parkland formula. Mean arterial pressure, pulse rate and urine output were at satisfactory levels. Clinically evident complications from fluid administration were minimal. Mortality was similar to that in other centres.ConclusionFluid resuscitation volumes significantly higher than those predicted by the Parkland formula were given, without adverse consequences. This retrospective review supports a prospective, multicentre, randomized, controlled study comparing this study with the Parkland formula, resulting in a better guide to initial fluid resuscitation in major burns.

9 keywords...

hide…