• J Chin Med Assoc · Jun 2023

    Evaluation of sagittal root position and labial alveolar bone concavity in the maxillary anterior tooth area for immediate implant placement.

    • Muhammad Ikbal, Yen-Wen Shen, Muhammad Ruslin, Lih-Jyh Fuh, and Jui-Ting Hsu.
    • School of Dentistry, China Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan, ROC.
    • J Chin Med Assoc. 2023 Jun 1; 86 (6): 565570565-570.

    BackgroundThe anatomical characteristics of the maxillary labial alveolar bone play a crucial role in the treatment planning of immediate implant placement. The sagittal root position (SRP) and alveolar bone concavity are closely related to anatomical characteristics in determining the ideal implant position. This study evaluated the SRP and labial alveolar bone concavity in the maxillary anterior teeth area.MethodsCone-beam computed tomography images of 120 samples involving 720 teeth were uploaded to the medical imaging software. The SRP was classified as Class I, II, III, or IV, and the concavity of labial alveolar bone was measured. A T test was performed to compare measurements between the central and lateral incisors, between the central incisors and canines, and between the lateral incisors and canine.ResultsThe majority of the SRPs of the maxillary anterior teeth were class I (engaging the labial cortical plate) with frequencies of 98.3%, 85.8%, and 81.7% for the canines, lateral incisors, and central incisors, respectively. In terms of concavity of labial alveolar bone in maxillary tooth area, canines also had the largest mean value (139.5°), followed by lateral incisors, whereas central incisors has the smallest mean value (131.7°). The results of the T test revealed a significant difference ( p < 0.001) in labial alveolar bone concavity between central and lateral incisors, between central incisors and canines, and between lateral incisors and canines.ConclusionMost maxillary anterior teeth were classified as Class I SRP, Class III SRP was the least prevalent, and the concavity of the labial alveolar bone significantly differed between the central and lateral incisors, between the central incisors and canines, and between the lateral incisors and canines. In addition, the canines had the highest mean alveolar bone concavity angle, indicating that less concavity in the canines area.Copyright © 2023, the Chinese Medical Association.

      Pubmed     Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…