• JAMA · Apr 2023

    Skin Cancer Screening: Updated Evidence Report and Systematic Review for the US Preventive Services Task Force.

    • Nora B Henrikson, Ilya Ivlev, Paula R Blasi, Matt B Nguyen, Caitlyn A Senger, Leslie A Perdue, and Jennifer S Lin.
    • Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Seattle, Washington.
    • JAMA. 2023 Apr 18; 329 (15): 129613071296-1307.

    ImportanceSkin cancer is the most common cancer type and is a major cause of morbidity.ObjectiveTo systematically review the benefits and harms of screening for skin cancer to inform the US Preventive Services Task Force.Data SourcesMEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials from June 1, 2015, through January 7, 2022; surveillance through December 16, 2022.Study SelectionEnglish-language studies conducted in asymptomatic populations 15 years or older.Data Extraction And SynthesisTwo reviewers independently appraised the articles and extracted relevant data from fair- or good-quality studies; results were narratively summarized.Main Outcomes And MeasuresMorbidity; mortality; skin cancer stage, precursor lesions, or lesion thickness at detection; harms of screening.ResultsTwenty studies in 29 articles were included (N = 6 053 411). Direct evidence on screening effectiveness was from 3 nonrandomized analyses of 2 population-based skin cancer screening programs in Germany (n = 1 791 615) and suggested no melanoma mortality benefit at the population level over 4 to 10 years' follow-up. Six studies (n = 2 935 513) provided inconsistent evidence on the association between clinician skin examination and lesion thickness or stage at diagnosis. Compared with usual care, routine clinician skin examination was not associated with increased detection of skin cancer or precursor lesions (5 studies) or stage at melanoma detection (3 studies). Evidence on the association between clinician skin examination and lesion thickness at detection was inconsistent (3 studies). Nine studies (n = 1 326 051) found a consistent positive association between more advanced stage at melanoma detection and increasing risk of melanoma-associated and all-cause mortality. Two studies (n = 232) found little to no persistent cosmetic or psychosocial harms associated with screening.Conclusions And RelevanceA substantial nonrandomized evidence base suggests a clear association between earlier stage at skin cancer detection and decreased mortality risk. However, nonrandomized studies suggest little to no melanoma mortality benefit associated with skin cancer screening with visual skin examination in adolescents or adults and no association between routine clinician skin examination and earlier stage at melanoma detection. Evidence is inconsistent regarding whether clinician skin examination is associated with thinner melanoma lesions at detection.

      Pubmed     Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

Want more great medical articles?

Keep up to date with a free trial of metajournal, personalized for your practice.
1,694,794 articles already indexed!

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.