• Sebastián F Ameriso and Virginia A Pujol Lereis.
• Centro Integral de Neurología Vascular, Departamento de Neurología, FLENI, Buenos Aires, Argentina. E-mail: sameriso@fleni.org.ar.
• Medicina (B Aires). 2023 Jan 1; 83 (2): 273277273-277.

AbstractNon-valvular atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most prevalent arrhythmia with high embolic potential, and one of the main and growing causes of stroke. The main objective of anticoagulation in patients with AF is prevention of stroke. Until recently, anticoagulation with vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) was the only available option. Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs), such as the direct thrombin inhibitor dabigatran, or the direct factor Xa inhibitors rivaroxaban, apixaban, and edoxaban, have a more favorable effectiveness/safety profile compared to VKAs. There are no studies comparing the efficacy of DOACs with each other. The choice of a DOAC arose from patient carachterictis, physician preferences, cost, and accessibility. Between 1-2% of patients correctly treated with a DOAC experience a stroke each year. The possibility of having a reversal agent should be taken into account when choosing a DOAC, especially due to the residual risk of stroke occurrences even under DOACs. Currently, in our country only dabigatran has a reversing agent available, making it the only DOAC that does not contraindicate the use of intravenous thrombolysis. This should be taken into account when choosing the DOAC for the prevention of thromboembolic events in patients with AF.

17 keywords...

hide…