• Corina M Bello, Simone Mackert, Michael A Harnik, Mark G Filipovic, Richard D Urman, and Markus M Luedi.
• Department of Anaesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, 3010, Freiburgstrasse Bern, Switzerland. corina.bello@insel.ch.
• Curr Pain Headache Rep. 2023 Jul 1; 27 (7): 193202193-202.

Purpose Of ReviewThe implementation of shared decision-making (SDM) in acute pain services (APS) is still in its infancies especially when compared to other medical fields.Recent FindingsEmerging evidence fosters the value of SDM in various acute care settings. We provide an overview of general SDM practices and possible advantages of incorporating such concepts in APS, point out barriers to SDM in this setting, present common patient decisions aids developed for APS and discuss opportunities for further development. Especially in the APS setting, patient-centred care is a key component for optimal patient outcome. SDM could be included into everyday clinical practice by using structured approaches such as the "seek, help, assess, reach, evaluate" (SHARE) approach, the 3 "MAking Good decisions In Collaboration"(MAGIC) questions, the "Benefits, Risks, Alternatives and doing Nothing"(BRAN) tool or the "the multifocal approach to sharing in shared decision-making"(MAPPIN'SDM) as guidance for participatory decision-making. Such tools aid in the development of a patient-clinician relationship beyond discharge after immediate relief of acute pain has been accomplished. Research addressing patient decision aids and their impact on patient-reported outcomes regarding shared decision-making, organizational barriers and new developments such as remote shared decision-making is needed to advance participatory decision-making in acute pain services.© 2023. The Author(s).

8 keywords...

hide…