• Spine · Aug 2023

    Socioeconomic and Racial/Ethnic Disparities in Perception of Health Status and Literacy in Spine Oncological Patients: Insights from the All of Us Research Program.

    • Aladine A Elsamadicy, Chelsea Wang, Benjamin C Reeves, Josiah J Z Sherman, Samuel Craft, Rami Rajjoub, Andrew Koo, Andrew M Hersh, Zach Pennington, Sheng-Fu Larry Lo, John H Shin, Ehud Mendel, and Daniel M Sciubba.
    • Department of Neurosurgery, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT.
    • Spine. 2023 Aug 1; 48 (15): 110711151107-1115.

    Study DesignA cross-sectional study was performed using the National Institutes of Health All of Us survey database.ObjectiveThe aim of this study was to assess socioeconomic and racial disparities in the perception of personal health, health literacy, and healthcare access among spine oncology patients.Summary Of Background DataRacial, ethnic, and socioeconomic disparities in health literacy and perception of health status have been described for many disease processes. However, few studies have assessed the prevalence of these disparities among spine oncology patients.MethodsAdult spine oncology patients, identified using ICD-9/10-CM codes, were categorized by race/ethnicity: White/Caucasian (WC), Black/African-American (BAA), and Non-White Hispanic (NWH). Demographics and socioeconomic status were assessed. Questionnaire responses regarding baseline health status, perception of health status, health literacy, and barriers to healthcare were compared.ResultsOf the 1,175 patients identified, 207 (17.6%) were BAA, 267 (22.7%) were NWH, and 701 (59.7%) were WC. Socioeconomic status varied among cohorts, with WC patients reporting higher levels of education ( P<0.001 ), annual income greater than $50K ( P<0.001 ), and home ownership ( P<0.001 ). BAA and NWH patients reported greater rates of 7-day "Severe fatigue" ( P<0.001 ) and "10/10 pain" ( P<0.001 ) and lower rates of "Completely" able to perform everyday activities ( P<0.001 ). WC patients had a higher response rate for "Excellent/Very Good" regarding their own general health ( P<0.001 ) and quality ( P<0.001 ). The WC cohort had a significantly higher proportion of patients responding "Never" when assessing difficulty understanding ( P<0.001 ) and needing assistance with health materials ( P<0.001 ). BAA and NWH were significantly less likely to report feeling "Extremely" confident with medical forms ( P<0.001 ). BAA and NWH had significantly higher response rates to feeling "Somewhat Worried" about healthcare costs ( P<0.001 ) and with delaying medical care given "Can't Afford Co-pay" ( P<0.001 ).ConclusionWe identified disparities in perception of health status, literacy, and access among spine oncology patients.Level Of Evidence4.Copyright © 2023 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.

      Pubmed     Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.