• Yigit Can Senol, Bige Sayin, Zeynep Gence Oz, Idris Gurpinar, Batuhan Dereli, Musa Onur Ozbakir, Ilkay Akmangit, and Ergun Daglioglu.
• Department of Neurologic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA; Department of Neurologic Surgery, Bilkent City Hospital, Ankara, Turkey. Electronic address: yigitcan.senol@sbu.edu.tr.
• World Neurosurg. 2023 Aug 1; 176: e162e172e162-e172.

BackgroundFlow-diverter treatments are successful endovascular treatments in protecting important perforating branches during aneurysm treatments. Because these treatments are performed under antiplatelet therapy, acute flow-diverter treatments in ruptured aneurysms are still controversial. Acute coiling followed by flow diversion has emerged as an intriguing and feasible treatment option for ruptured anterior choroidal artery aneurysm treatment. As a single-center retrospective case series study, this study reported the clinical and angiographic results of staged endovascular treatment in patients with a ruptured anterior choroidal aneurysm.MethodsThis is a single-center retrospective case series study between March 2011 and May 2021. Patients with ruptured anterior choroidal aneurysm received flow-diverter therapy in a different session after acute coiling. Patients treated with primary coiling or only flow diversion were excluded. Preoperative demographic and presenting symptoms, aneurysm morphology, perioperative and postoperative complications, and long-term clinical and angiographic outcome as measured using the modified Rankin Scale and O'Kelly Morata Grading scale and also Raymond-Roy occlusion classification respectively.ResultsSixteen patients underwent coiling in the acute phase to undergo flow diversion later. The mean maximum aneurysm diameter is 5.44 ± 3.39 mm. All patients had a subarachnoid hemorrhage and were treated acutely between days 0 and 3 of acute bleeding. The mean age at the presentation was 54.12 ± 12 years (32-73 years). Two patients (12.5%) had minor ischemic complications, which are seen on magnetic resonance angiography as clinically silent infarcts, after the procedure. One patient (6.2%) had a technical complication with the flow-diverter shortening and deployed a second flow diverter telescopically. No mortality or permanent morbidity was reported. The mean interval time between the 2 treatments was 24.06 ± 11.83 days. All patients were followed up with digital subtraction angiography; 14/16 patients (87.5%) had aneurysms that were completely occluded and 2/16 (12.5%) showed near-complete occlusion. Mean follow-up was 16.62 ± 3.22 months; all patients had modified Rankin Scale scores ≤2; 14/16 (87.5%) had a total occlusion 14/16 (87.5%) had near-complete occlusion. None of the patients had retreatment or rebleeding.ConclusionsStaged treatment of ruptured anterior choroidal artery aneurysms with acute coiling and flow-diverter treatment after recovery from subarachnoid hemorrhage is safe and effective. In this series, no cases of rebleeding occurred during the interval between coiling and flow diversion. Staged treatment should be considered a valid option in patients with challenging ruptured anterior choroidal aneurysms.Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

28 keywords...

hide…