• Lauri Holmstrom, Harpriya Chugh, Audrey Uy-Evanado, Jonathan Jui, Kyndaron Reinier, and Sumeet S Chugh.
• Center for Cardiac Arrest Prevention, Department of Cardiology, Smidt Heart Institute, Cedars-Sinai Health System, Los Angeles, CA.
• Ann Emerg Med. 2023 Oct 1; 82 (4): 463471463-471.

Study ObjectiveThe proportion of nonshockable sudden cardiac arrests (pulseless electrical activity and asystole) continues to rise. Survival is lower than shockable (ventricular fibrillation [VF]) sudden cardiac arrests, but there is little community-based information on temporal trends in the incidence and survival from sudden cardiac arrests based on presenting rhythms. We investigated community-based temporal trends in sudden cardiac arrest incidence and survival by presenting rhythm.MethodsWe prospectively evaluated the incidence of each presenting sudden cardiac arrest rhythm and survival outcomes for out-of-hospital events in the Portland, Oregon metro area (population of approximately 1 million, 2002 to 2017). We limited inclusion to cases of likely cardiac cause with resuscitation attempted by emergency medical services.ResultsOut of 3,723 overall sudden cardiac arrest cases, 908 (24%) presented with pulseless electrical activity, 1,513 (41%) with VF, and 1,302 (35%) with asystole. The incidence of pulseless electrical activity-sudden cardiac arrest remained stable over 4-year periods (9.6/100,000 in 2002 to 2005, 7.4/100,000 in 2006 to 2009, 5.7/100,000 in 2010 to 2013, and 8.3/100,000 in 2014 to 2017; unadjusted beta [β] -0.56; 95% confidence interval [CI], -3.98 to 2.85). The incidence of VF-sudden cardiac arrests decreased over time (14.6/100,000 in 2002 to 2005, 13.4/100,000 in 2006 to 2009, 12.0/100,000 in 2010 to 2013, and 11.6/100,000 in 2014 to 2017; unadjusted β -1.05; 95% CI, -1.68 to -0.42) and asystole-sudden cardiac arrests (8.6/100,000 in 2002 to 2005, 9.0/100,000 in 2006 to 2009, 10.3/100,000 in 2010 to 2013, and 15.7/100,000 in 2014 to 2017; unadjusted β 2.25; 95% CI -1.24 to 5.73) did not change significantly over time. Survival increased over time for pulseless electrical activity-sudden cardiac arrests (5.7%, 4.3%, 9.6%, 13.6%; unadjusted β 2.8%; 95% CI 1.3 to 4.4) and VF-sudden cardiac arrests (27.5%, 29.8%, 37.9%, 36.6%; unadjusted β 3.5%; 95% CI 1.4 to 5.6), but not for asystole-sudden cardiac arrests (1.7%, 1.6%, 4.0%, 2.4%; unadjusted β 0.3%; 95% CI, -0.4 to 1.1). Enhancements in the emergency medical services system's pulseless electrical activity-sudden cardiac arrest management were temporally associated with the increasing pulseless electrical activity survival rates.ConclusionsOver a 16-year period, the incidence of VF/ventricular tachycardia decreased over time, but pulseless electrical activity incidence remained stable. Survival from both VF-sudden cardiac arrests and pulseless electrical activity-sudden cardiac arrests increased over time with a more than 2-fold increase for pulseless electrical activity-sudden cardiac arrests.Copyright © 2023 American College of Emergency Physicians. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

24 keywords...

hide…