• Suk Joon Lee, Philip S Lee, Amir H Faraji, R Mark Richardson, and Vasileios Kokkinos.
• 1Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
• J. Neurosurg. 2023 Dec 1; 139 (6): 159816031598-1603.

ObjectiveThe stereoelectroencephalography (SEEG) procedure provides a unique 3D overview of the seizure-onset zone. Although the success of SEEG relies on the accuracy of depth electrode implantation, few studies have investigated how different implantation techniques and operative variables affect accuracy. This study examined the effect of two different electrode implantation techniques (external vs internal stylet) on implantation accuracy while controlling for other operative variables.MethodsThe implantation accuracy of 508 depth electrodes from 39 SEEG cases was measured after coregistration of postimplantation CT or MR images with planned trajectories. Two different implantation techniques were compared: preset length with internal stylet use and measured length with external stylet use. Correlations between implantation accuracy and technique type, entry angle, intended implantation depth, and other operative variables were determined statistically using multiple regression analysis.ResultsMultiple regression analysis showed that the internal stylet technique exhibited a larger target radial error (p = 0.046) and angular deviation (p = 0.039) with a smaller depth error (p < 0.001) than the external stylet technique. Entry angle and implantation depth were positively correlated with target radial error (p = 0.007 and < 0.001, respectively) only for the internal stylet technique.ConclusionsBetter target radial accuracy was achieved when an external stylet was used to open the intraparenchymal pathway for the depth electrode. In addition, more oblique trajectories were equally accurate to orthogonal ones with the usage of an external stylet, while more oblique trajectories were associated with larger target radial errors with the usage of an internal stylet (without an external stylet).

14 keywords...

hide…