-
- Céline Casta, Sophie Bucher, Pierre Labitrie, Théotime Nadot, Henri Panjo, and Laurent Rigal.
- Université Côte d'Azur, Education and Research General Practice Department, RETINES, HEALTHY, Nice, France.
- Fam Pract. 2024 Aug 14; 41 (4): 451459451-459.
BackgroundAssociated with both socioeconomic position and health outcomes, health literacy (HL) may be a mechanism contributing to social disparities. However, it is often difficult for general practitioners (GPs) to assess their patients' HL level.ObjectiveTo analyse disagreements about patient HL between GPs and their patients according to the patient's socioeconomic position.MethodsFor each of the 15 participating GPs (from the Paris-Saclay University network), every adult consulting at the practice on a single day was recruited. Patients completed the European HL Survey questionnaire and provided socio-demographic information. For each patient, doctors answered 4 questions from the HL questionnaire with their opinion of the patient's HL. The doctor-patient disagreement about each patient's HL was analysed with mixed logistic models to study its associations with patients' occupational, educational, and financial characteristics.ResultsThe analysis covered the 292 patients (88.2% of the 331 included patients) for whom both patients and GPs responded. The overall disagreement was 23.9%. In all, 71.8% of patients estimated their own HL as higher than their doctors did, and the gap between doctors' answers and those of their patients widened from the top to the bottom of the social ladder. The odd ratio for the 'synthetic disagreement' variable for workers versus managers was 3.48 (95% CI: 1.46-8.26).ConclusionsThe lower the patient's place on the social ladder, the greater the gap between the patient's and doctor's opinion of the patient's HL. This greater gap may contribute to the reproduction or maintenance of social disparities in care and health.© The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For commercial re-use, please contact reprints@oup.com for reprints and translation rights for reprints. All other permissions can be obtained through our RightsLink service via the Permissions link on the article page on our site—for further information please contact journals.permissions@oup.com.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:
![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.